Part ofPublic Lands →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

FEDERALcongressional record

High Impact

Proposed Protection for Ruby Mountains and Ruby Lake

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6422

Record date · June 24, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Senator Catherine Cortez Masto has introduced an amendment to the annual defense authorization bill that would prohibit new mineral leasing on approximately 350,000 acres of federal land in Nevada. The proposal covers specific areas within the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest and the Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge.

Why it matters

This amendment would permanently restrict new mining operations on over 349,000 acres of public land in Nevada, subject to existing legal rights.

Background

Catherine Cortez Masto is a U.S. Senator representing Nevada. context
The Ruby Mountains are a mountain range located in Elko County, Nevada, known for their ecological diversity. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Mining companies

Companies seeking new mineral leases in the specified Ruby Mountains and Ruby Lake areas would be prohibited from doing so.

Directly affected

United States Fish and Wildlife Service

The agency is responsible for managing the Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge and maintaining the maps for public inspection.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this amendment stop all activity in the Ruby Mountains?

No, it specifically withdraws the land from '.' It also includes an exception for noncommercial management activities by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

What happens to existing mining rights in these areas?

The amendment states that the is 'subject to valid existing rights,' meaning current legal rights are preserved.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Follow the record

Votes, people, money & the original source

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Related Legislation

congressional record

Senate Scheduling Update for S. 4784

The Senate has agreed to delay the vote on a cloture motion for S. 4784 until after the confirmation vote for the Schwartz nomination. This procedural

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference100% confidence

Reference to S. 258

The amendment references a map from a 2019 bill (S. 258), indicating this proposal is part of a long-standing legislative effort to protect the Ruby Mountains.

S. 258

Connected Entities

Forest Service, Ruby Mountains, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and 1 more

OrganizationForest Service“Manages the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest.”Map →

locationRuby Mountains“The geographic area affected by the proposed land withdrawal.”Map →

OrganizationUnited States Fish and Wildlife Service“Manages the Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge.”Map →

PersonCatherine Cortez Masto“U.S. Senator who submitted the amendment.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100

Significance75
How much this matters to a regular citizen
Controversy60
Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
Entertainment10
Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
Buzz20
Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools