POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Massachusetts bill H.1966 requires proportional sharing of legal fees and caps insurer liens on injury recovery proceeds

Original title: An Act concerning equitable allocation of recovery proceeds for subrogation claims

Last action · February 9, 2026: Accompanied a new draft, see H5062Sponsor: Jeff Roy

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Massachusetts bill H.1966 requires health maintenance organizations and medical insurers to share attorney's fees and costs in proportion to the amounts they recover from judgments or settlements. It limits an insurer's or right of reimbursement to its proportionate share of the recovery based on the complete value of the injured person's tort damages, and permits courts to reduce liens when available funds are less than total damages.

Why it matters

Changes how much money injured patients must pay back to their health insurers or health maintenance organizations out of personal injury settlements or court judgments, and allows courts to reduce insurer s if total funds do not cover all damages.

Background
  • Jeffrey N. Roy serves as a member of the Massachusetts House of Representatives representing Franklin. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

injured persons

Injured individuals share legal expenses proportionally with insurers and may have insurer reimbursement liens reduced by a court if funds are insufficient.

Directly affected

health maintenance organizations and medical insurers

Insurers must contribute to attorney's fees and are restricted from claiming reimbursement liens that exceed their proportionate share of a recovery.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How are attorney's fees divided between an injured person and an insurer under this bill?
Attorney's fees and costs incurred in obtaining a judgment, compromise, or settlement must be divided between the health maintenance organization, hospital, or medical service corporation and the injured person in proportion to the amounts each receives from the recovery.
Can a court reduce an insurer's lien if the settlement funds are insufficient to cover all damages?
Yes, if the settlement, judgment, or available funds are less than the plaintiff's total damages, the court may reduce the insurer's after a hearing and after evaluating the plaintiff's total cognizable damages at law.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

6 actions
  1. Feb 9, 2026House
    Accompanied a new draft, see H5062
  2. Nov 4, 2025Joint
    Hearing rescheduled to 11/04/2025 from 01:00 PM-05:00 PM in A-1 and Virtual<br> <span style="color: blue; font-style: italic;">Hearing updated to New End Time</span>
  3. Nov 4, 2025Joint
    Hearing rescheduled to 11/04/2025 from 01:00 PM-02:30 PM in A-1 and Virtual<br> <span style="color: blue; font-style: italic;">Hearing updated to New End Time</span>
  4. Oct 29, 2025Joint
    Hearing scheduled for 11/04/2025 from 01:00 PM-05:00 PM in A-1
  5. Feb 27, 2025Senate
    Senate concurred
  6. Feb 27, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to the committee on The Judiciary

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Jeff Roy, The Judiciary
PersonJeff Roy“Representative who filed the petition for House, No. 1966”Map →
OrganizationThe Judiciary“Committee to which the petition was referred”Map →

Sources

Open source document

malegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record