POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas exempts small municipalities and certain counties from public beach lifeguard requirements

Original title: Relating to the exemption of certain municipalities and counties from requirements regarding the use of lifeguards on public beaches.

Last action · May 13, 2025: Placed on General State CalendarSponsor: A.J. Louderback

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Certain municipalities with populations under 1,000 and specific counties are exempted from mandatory lifeguard requirements on public beaches, effective September 1, 2025.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Certain municipalities with a population of less than 1,000

Municipalities meeting the population and location criteria are exempted from mandatory lifeguard requirements on public beaches.

Directly affected

Certain counties with a population between 32,000 and 40,000

Counties meeting the population criteria are exempted from mandatory lifeguard requirements.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which municipalities are exempt from the lifeguard requirements?
Municipalities with a population of less than 1,000 that are located in a county adjacent to a county with a population of more than 3.3 million, or in a county with a population between 32,000 and 40,000.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · on the House floor.

Procedural history

14 actions
  1. May 13, 2025House
    Placed on General State Calendar
  2. May 11, 2025House
    Considered in Calendars
  3. May 10, 2025House
    Committee report sent to Calendars
  4. May 10, 2025House
    Committee report distributed
  5. May 10, 2025House
    Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  6. May 8, 2025HouseCommittee
    Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
Show 8 earlier actions
  1. May 8, 2025House
    Considered in formal meeting
  2. Apr 8, 2025House
    Left pending in committee
  3. Apr 8, 2025House
    Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  4. Apr 8, 2025House
    Considered in public hearing
  5. Apr 8, 2025House
    Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Mar 14, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Culture, Recreation & Tourism
  7. Mar 14, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time
  8. Jan 16, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

A.J. Louderback, Gulf of Mexico
PersonA.J. Louderback“Bill author / sponsor”Map →
locationGulf of Mexico“Geographic reference for municipality location”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 35)
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record