POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Oregon House Bill 4105 Directs State Forester to Set Timber Harvest Levels and Manage State Forestland

Original title: Directs the State Forester to determine the available state forestland, establish sustainable harvest levels for harvesting timber on state forestland and manage available state forestland.

Last action · March 6, 2026: In committee upon adjournment.Sponsors: Mark Owens and 12 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

Digest: The Act tells the State Forester to see how much forestland there is. The Act tells the State Forester to make harvest levels for cutting timber on state forestland. The Act tells the State Forester to manage state forestland. The Act says some people can ask for a court order to tell the State Forester to comply with this Act. (Flesch Readability Score: 75.9). Directs the State Forester to determine the available state forestland, establish sustainable harvest levels for harvesting timber on state forestland and manage available state forestland. Allows certain persons to seek a court order if the State Forester fails to establish sustainable harvest levels or manage available state forestland. Declares an emergency, effective on passage.

Why it matters

Local taxing districts and entities entitled to state forest revenues gain legal standing to sue in court if timber harvests and forest management do not meet statutory requirements.

Background
  • State forestlands in Oregon are managed under statutory guidelines that generate revenues for counties and local taxing districts. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

State Forester

Must determine available state forestland, adopt 10-year sustainable timber harvest levels by January 1, 2027, and manage lands under potential court oversight.

Directly affected

Revenue-recipient entities and individuals

Entities entitled to state forest revenues under ORS 530.110 or 530.115 gain the right to seek a court order in Marion County to compel compliant management.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a sustainable timber harvest level under this bill?
It is a planned volume of timber to be harvested over a 10-year period, broken down into annual increments from .
Who can ask for a court order if the State Forester fails to follow the law?
Any person may apply for an order to compel a harvest level determination, and individuals or entities entitled to state forest revenues may apply for an order to enforce management compliance.
When does the State Forester have to adopt the first harvest level?
The initial must be adopted on or before January 1, 2027.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

7 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026House
    In committee upon adjournment.
  2. Feb 17, 2026House
    Referred to Ways and Means by prior reference.
  3. Feb 17, 2026House
    Recommendation: Do pass and be referred to Ways and Means by prior reference.
  4. Feb 16, 2026House
    Public Hearing and Work Session held.
  5. Feb 11, 2026House
    Public Hearing held.
  6. Feb 2, 2026House
    Referred to Agriculture, Land Use, Natural Resources, and Water with subsequent referral to Ways and Means.
Show 1 earlier action
  1. Feb 2, 2026House
    First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Judicial Enforceability of Forest Management

The bill introduces explicit legal standing for individuals and revenue-recipient entities to compel state forest management actions through court orders in Marion County.

Connected Entities

National Marine Fisheries Service, State Board of Forestry, State Forester and 2 more
OrganizationNational Marine Fisheries Service“Federal agency involved in habitat conservation plan approvals”Map →
OrganizationState Board of Forestry“Board providing authority and direction for the adoption of sustainable timber h”Map →
PersonState Forester“Official directed to determine forestland, set harvest levels, and manage state ”Map →
locationCircuit Court for Marion County“Court where individuals or entities may apply for an order directing compliance”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Fish and Wildlife Service“Federal agency involved in habitat conservation plan approvals”Map →

Sources

Open source document

olis.oregonlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record