POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Contract Extension for Mowing at CDA Housing Properties

Original title: CDA Resolution No. 4705 - Approval of a one-year contract extension for Prairie Pro Services LLC mowing at all CDA housing properties.

Record date · March 12, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

The Community Development Authority () has approved a one-year contract extension for Prairie Pro Services LLC to provide mowing services at all CDA-managed housing properties.

Why it matters

This ensures continued grounds maintenance services for all housing residents for the next year.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

CDA housing residents

Residents will receive continued grounds maintenance services from the contracted vendor.

Directly affected

Prairie Pro Services LLC

The company is authorized to continue providing mowing services for CDA properties for an additional year.

Key Facts

  • The Community Development Authority approved a one-year contract extension for mowing services.
  • The vendor for these services is Prairie Pro Services LLC.
  • The contract covers mowing at all CDA housing properties.
  • The resolution is identified as CDA Resolution No. 4705.
Show all 6 facts
  • The file number for this action is 92279.
  • The resolution was introduced on March 9, 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who will be mowing the grass at my CDA housing property?
Prairie Pro Services LLC will continue to provide mowing services under a one-year contract extension.
How long is this contract extension for?
The extension is for a period of one year.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sources

Open source document

webapi.legistar.com

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy5
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record