POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Ohio House Bill 548 requires mandatory alcohol and drug testing for peace and corrections officers after use-of-force incidents

Original title: Require alcohol, drug testing after officer use of force incident

Last action · October 29, 2025: Referred to Public SafetySponsors: Darnell Brewer and 4 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Ohio House Bill 548 requires peace officers and corrections officers to submit to a chemical test for alcohol and drugs within three hours of any use-of-force incident that results in serious physical harm or death. If the test indicates a of alcohol or substances, the employer must report the results to prosecutors and the bureau of criminal identification and investigation, and take corrective or disciplinary action.

Why it matters

Changes post-incident accountability protocols for law enforcement and corrections officers in Ohio by mandating chemical testing after serious use-of-force events, overriding conflicting collective bargaining agreements.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

peace officers

Peace officers must submit to chemical testing within three hours of a use-of-force incident resulting in serious harm or death and face disciplinary action for refusal or positive results.

Directly affected

corrections officers

Corrections officers are subject to mandatory chemical testing after use-of-force incidents in detention facilities and face disciplinary measures for non-compliance.

Directly affected

public employers

Public employers must report positive chemical test results to prosecutors and investigative bureaus and execute appropriate corrective or disciplinary actions.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which officers are required to take a chemical test under this bill?
Peace officers and corrections officers who engage in a use-of-force incident resulting in serious physical harm to persons or property, or death, must submit to a chemical test.
What is the timeline for administering the chemical test?
The chemical test must be administered within three hours after the use-of-force incident.
What happens if an officer tests positive for a prescribed medication?
Testing rules do not apply if the officer obtained the controlled substance pursuant to a valid prescription and used, injected, inhaled, or ingested it in accordance with the health professional's directions.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Oct 29, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Public Safety
  2. Oct 22, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift99% confidence

Collective Bargaining Override

The legislation explicitly amends section 4117.10 to ensure that mandatory officer chemical testing requirements prevail over conflicting collective bargaining agreements.

Connected Entities

Tristan Rader, bureau of criminal identification and investigation, Darnell Brewer and 7 more
PersonTristan Rader“Democratic Representative, District 13, co-sponsor”Map →
Organizationbureau of criminal identification and investigation“Investigative agency receiving test result reports”Map →
PersonDarnell Brewer“Democratic Representative, District 22”Map →
Persondirector of health“State official approving testing methods and issuing permits”Map →
Organizationoffice of collective bargaining“Office in the department of administrative services”Map →
Organizationdepartment of administrative services“Department housing the office of collective bargaining”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly of the State of Ohio“Legislative body enacting the bill”Map →
PersonJuanita Brent“Democratic Representative, District 18, co-sponsor”Map →
PersonElgin Rogers“Democratic Representative, District 42, co-sponsor”Map →
PersonCrystal Lett“Democratic Representative, District 11, co-sponsor”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legislature.ohio.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment15
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record