POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Congressional Hearing: Net Neutrality and Antitrust Law

Original title: NET NEUTRALITY AND THE ROLE OF ANTITRUST

Record date · January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is the official record of a 2017 House Judiciary Subcommittee hearing examining the intersection of policies and enforcement. It includes opening statements and testimony from Federal Trade Commission officials and industry representatives regarding how competition laws apply to internet service providers.

Why it matters

The hearing explored whether existing laws are sufficient to regulate internet service providers or if specific regulations are necessary to ensure fair competition and consumer access.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Internet Service Providers

The regulatory framework discussed directly impacts their operational requirements and legal obligations regarding network management.

Directly affected

Rural Broadband Association (NTCA)

The association represents rural providers whose business models and infrastructure investments are subject to the regulatory policies discussed.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on November 1, 2017, before the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial and Antitrust Law.
  • The session focused on the role of antitrust law in the context of net neutrality.
  • Testimony was provided by officials from the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission.
  • Industry perspective was provided by the Rural Broadband Association (NTCA).
Show all 6 facts
  • The record includes written responses to questions for the record from all four witnesses.
  • Additional materials, including reports and articles, were submitted for the record by committee members.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to discuss how laws interact with and to gather expert testimony on the regulatory landscape for internet service providers.
Who testified at this hearing?
Witnesses included Maureen K. Ohlhausen (FTC), Michael Romano (NTCA), Terrell McSweeny (FTC), and Robert M. McDowell (former FCC Commissioner).

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Regulatory Oversight Debate

The hearing highlights a clear tension between using existing antitrust enforcement versus creating specific net neutrality regulations to govern internet service providers.

Connected Entities

Terrell McSweeny, Maureen K. Ohlhausen, Robert M. McDowell and 3 more
PersonTerrell McSweeny“Commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission”Map →
PersonMaureen K. Ohlhausen“Acting Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission”Map →
PersonRobert M. McDowell“Former Commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission”Map →
OrganizationHouse Committee on the Judiciary“The parent committee overseeing the subcommittee”Map →
PersonMichael Romano“Senior Vice President at NTCA (The Rural Broadband Association)”Map →
PersonTom Marino“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial and Antitrust Law”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record