The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Senate Hearing on Common Varieties Act Amendments (1966)
Record date · July 20, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This document is a transcript of a 1966 Senate subcommittee hearing regarding proposed amendments to the Act of 1955. The hearing focused on two specific bills, S. 2281 and S. 3485, which sought to modify how certain mineral materials are classified and managed on federal lands.
The hearing addressed the legal classification of mineral deposits on public lands, which determines whether those materials can be claimed under mining laws or must be purchased from the government.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Mining industry operators
The proposed amendments would change the legal requirements for claiming or purchasing mineral materials from federal lands.
Federal land management agencies
These agencies are responsible for enforcing the classification and disposal rules for mineral materials on public lands.
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on June 28, 1966, during the 89th Congress.
- The purpose was to review proposed amendments to Section 3 of the Common Varieties Act of 1955.
- The specific bills under consideration were S. 2281 and S. 3485.
- The 1955 Act (69 Stat. 367, 368) governs the disposal of 'common varieties' of sand, stone, gravel, pumice, pumicite, cinders, and clay on public lands.
Show all 5 facts
- The hearing was conducted by the Subcommittee on Minerals, Materials, and Fuels.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Common Varieties Act?
What were S. 2281 and S. 3485 trying to do?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
