POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Congressional Hearing on Proposed Changes to Fair Housing Rules

Original title: A THREAT TO AMERICA'S CHILDREN: THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION'S PROPOSAL TO GUT FAIR HOUSING ACCOUNTABILITY

January 1, 2020

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing addresses a proposed federal rule change that could alter how local governments are required to identify and remedy housing discrimination, potentially affecting federal housing funding and local housing policies nationwide.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Children

The hearing focused on how housing stability and neighborhood conditions impact child health and long-term economic mobility.

Local Governments

Changes to HUD rules impact the requirements local jurisdictions must meet to receive federal housing funding.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2020.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a February 5, 2020, House Subcommittee hearing regarding a proposed Trump Administration rule that would change how the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) enforces the Fair Housing Act. The hearing examined concerns that the proposal would reduce accountability for addressing housing discrimination and negatively impact children's development and economic mobility.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on February 5, 2020, before the Subcommittee on Civil Rights and Civil Liberties.
  • The subject was a proposed HUD rule intended to modify the 'Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing' mandate established by the 1968 Fair Housing Act.
  • The Subcommittee Chair stated the proposed rule would reduce accountability for government progress on fair housing.
  • Witnesses included representatives from the National Fair Housing Alliance, the City of New Orleans, Children's Healthwatch, BOND, Inc., and the Manhattan Institute.
  • The hearing included testimony on the link between housing stability and child health and development.
  • Documents submitted for the record included letters from the National Education Association, the Texas Low Income Housing Information Service, and 24 faith organizations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the 'Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing' mandate?
It is a requirement under the 1968 Fair Housing Act that directs HUD and other federal agencies to take active steps to remedy systemic housing discrimination and segregation.
Why was this hearing held?
To examine a proposed rule by the Trump Administration that critics argue would weaken the government's ability to enforce fair housing standards.

Why It Matters

The hearing addresses a proposed federal rule change that could alter how local governments are required to identify and remedy housing discrimination, potentially affecting federal housing funding and local housing policies nationwide.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Regulatory Rollback

The hearing highlights a shift in federal oversight strategy regarding the 1968 Fair Housing Act during the 2020 administration.

Connected Entities

personJorge Andres SotoWitness, Director of Public Policy at National Fair Housing AllianceMap →
personAteira GriffinWitness, CEO and Founder, BOND, Inc.Map →
personEllen LeeWitness, Director of Community and Economic Development, City of New OrleansMap →
personJamie RaskinChairman of the Subcommittee on Civil Rights and Civil LibertiesMap →
personMichael HendrixWitness, Director of State and Local Policy, Manhattan InstituteMap →
organizationDepartment of Housing and Urban DevelopmentThe federal agency responsible for the proposed rule changeMap →
personDr. Megan SandelWitness, Principal Investigator, Children's HealthwatchMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record