POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas HB 1504 Expands Medical Cannabis Program, Licenses Testing Facilities, and Authorizes Patient Registries

Original title: Relating to authorizing the possession, use, cultivation, distribution, transportation, and delivery of medical cannabis for medical use by qualifying patients with certain debilitating medical conditions and the licensing of dispensing organizations and cannabis testing facilities; authorizing fees.

Last action · March 12, 2025: Referred to Public HealthSponsor: Ron Reynolds

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Texas HB 1504 authorizes the possession, cultivation, distribution, and delivery of full medical cannabis for qualifying patients with specified debilitating medical conditions, replaces the prior low-THC limits, and establishes licensing for cannabis testing facilities and registry cards for patients and caregivers.

Why it matters

Qualifying patients with debilitating medical conditions gain legal protection from arrest and prosecution, access to broader medical cannabis formulations through licensed s, and alternative practitioner recommendations from advanced practice registered nurses and physician assistants.

Background
  • Texas previously operated a restrictive Compassionate-Use Program limited strictly to low-THC cannabis prescribed by specialized physicians for specific conditions. context
  • House Bill 1504 was introduced in the 89th Texas Legislature by Representative Reynolds and referred to the Public Health committee. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Qualifying patients

Qualifying patients gain legal protections from arrest, expanded access to medical cannabis formulations, and authorization to possess specified amounts of cannabis or plants for medical use.

Directly affected

Dispensing organizations

Dispensing organizations are subject to updated licensing standards, annual fee adjustments, mandatory product testing and labeling requirements, and new verification duties.

Directly affected

Medical practitioners

Licensed physicians, advanced practice registered nurses, and physician assistants gain the authority to recommend medical cannabis via written certifications and must register in the compassionate-use registry.

Directly affected

Cannabis testing facilities

Cannabis testing facilities become formally licensed entities required to test the safety and potency of medical cannabis under Department of Public Safety rules.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is eligible to receive medical cannabis under this bill?
Qualifying patients who have been diagnosed with a debilitating medical condition—such as cancer, PTSD, severe pain, epilepsy, or other approved conditions—by a registered medical practitioner.
Can medical practitioners other than doctors recommend medical cannabis?
Yes, licensed physicians, advanced practice registered nurses, and physician assistants with delegated prescriptive authority may recommend medical cannabis through a .
Are local governments allowed to ban medical cannabis businesses or cultivation?
No, municipalities, counties, and other political subdivisions are expressly prohibited from enacting ordinances or orders that prohibit the cultivation, production, dispensing, or possession of authorized medical cannabis.
What happens if a patient has applied for a registry card but has not yet received it?
Applicants may receive medical cannabis from a before receiving their physical card by providing proof of application, paid fees, and a copy of their .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Mar 12, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Public Health
  2. Mar 12, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time
  3. Dec 4, 2024HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift99% confidence

Transition from Low-THC to Full Medical Cannabis Framework

The bill comprehensively strikes references to 'low-THC cannabis' and replaces them with 'medical cannabis', broadening qualifying conditions and authorized practitioner types.

Connected Entities

Department of Public Safety, National Institutes of Health, Federal Drug Enforcement Administration and 4 more
OrganizationDepartment of Public Safety“State agency tasked with adopting rules, issuing registry cards, and maintaining”Map →
OrganizationNational Institutes of Health“Consulted in designating incurable neurodegenerative diseases”Map →
OrganizationFederal Drug Enforcement Administration“Federal agency from which certain handlers are exempt from registering under sta”Map →
PersonRon Reynolds“Bill author in the House”Map →
OrganizationHealth and Human Services Commission“State commission involved in designating incurable neurodegenerative diseases”Map →
OrganizationFood and Drug Administration“Federal agency referenced regarding general drug approvals”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Family and Protective Services“State agency restricted from taking child custody based solely on authorized med”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record