POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofChina
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Senate Hearing on U.S.-China Technology Competition

Original title: COUNTERING THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA'S ECONOMIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL PLAN FOR DOMINANCE

January 1, 2022

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing informs potential future legislation and policy regarding U.S. economic and technological competition with China, which impacts domestic industries, academic research, and international trade relations.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Technology Sector

Companies in this sector are subject to potential policy changes regarding international trade, supply chain security, and competition with Chinese firms.

Academic Institutions

Universities are being engaged by the committee regarding security risks and the protection of critical research from foreign influence.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2022.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence held a public hearing to examine the economic and technological strategies of the People's Republic of China. Senators and expert witnesses discussed the implications of China's efforts to lead in critical technologies and the resulting challenges for U.S. national security and the global order.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on May 11, 2022, by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.
  • The committee focused on the economic and technological competition between the U.S. and the People's Republic of China.
  • Chairman Warner stated the committee's focus is on the Chinese Communist Party and its authoritarian order, not the Chinese people or Chinese-Americans.
  • The committee has been conducting 'classified roadshows' to inform industry, academia, and the public about threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party.
  • The committee previously held an open hearing on counterintelligence threats from the PRC in August 2021.
  • The hearing highlighted the role of Huawei as a dominant supplier of global communications infrastructure as a primary concern for U.S. intelligence.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
To publicly examine the economic and technological strategies of the People's Republic of China and discuss how these strategies impact U.S. national security and the global order.
Who testified at the hearing?
The witnesses were Dr. James Mulvenon (Senior China Analyst), Dr. Dewey Murdick (Director of Georgetown University's Center for Security and Emerging Technology), and Hon. Nazak Nikakhtar (Partner at Wiley Rein LLP).

Why It Matters

This hearing informs potential future legislation and policy regarding U.S. economic and technological competition with China, which impacts domestic industries, academic research, and international trade relations.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift toward public engagement

The committee is moving beyond traditional closed-door intelligence briefings to conduct public hearings and 'classified roadshows' to educate the private sector and academia.

Connected Entities

organizationHuaweiCited as an example of a Chinese national champion in communications infrastructMap →
personMark R. WarnerChairman of the Senate Select Committee on IntelligenceMap →
personNazak NikakhtarWitness, Partner at Wiley Rein LLP and former Assistant Secretary for Industry aMap →
personMarco RubioVice Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on IntelligenceMap →
personDewey MurdickWitness, Director of Georgetown University's Center for Security and Emerging TeMap →
organizationPeople's Republic of ChinaSubject of the hearing regarding economic and technological dominanceMap →
personJames MulvenonWitness, Senior China AnalystMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record