The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Congressional Hearing on Sexual Harassment in Science
Record date · January 1, 2019
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
The House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology held a hearing to examine the prevalence of sexual harassment in scientific research environments. The committee discussed how institutional culture and funding structures often prioritize reputation over accountability, potentially driving talented researchers out of fields.
This hearing addresses syic barriers in scientific research that impact the retention of women in STEM careers and the effective use of public research funding.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Women in STEM
They are the primary group experiencing the reported hostile work environments and professional sabotage.
Academic and Research Institutions
These institutions face scrutiny regarding their internal investigation processes and the management of grant-funded researchers.
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on June 12, 2019, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The committee identified that sexual harassment in science is often enabled by institutional cultures that prioritize reputation and grant funding over transparency.
- The committee noted that 'bad actors' in research are often allowed to resign quietly and move to other institutions rather than facing full investigations.
- The hearing included testimony from representatives of the GAO, Wellesley College, Boston University, and the University of California, Davis.
Show all 5 facts
- The committee emphasized that sexual harassment is a barrier to national economic and security goals by limiting the talent pool in STEM fields.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Institutional Accountability Gap
The hearing highlights a systemic pattern where academic institutions prioritize grant funding and reputation over investigating sexual harassment claims.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance75How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools