POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Massachusetts requires public colleges to accept advanced placement exam scores of 3 or higher for degree credit

Original title: An Act relative to advanced placement examinations

Last action · June 23, 2025: Accompanied a new draft, see S2536Sponsors: Mike Moore and 3 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Public institutions of higher education in Massachusetts must adopt policies to accept advanced placement exam scores of 3, 4, or 5 to satisfy degree requirements. The Department of Higher Education will determine the exact effective date within one year of enactment, and institutions must publish their credit policies online.

Why it matters

College students attending public institutions in Massachusetts may receive degree credits for advanced placement exam scores of 3 or higher, potentially reducing course requirements and tuition costs, unless an institution provides academic justification to require a score above 3.

Background
  • Michael O. Moore represents the Second Worcester District in the Massachusetts Senate. context
  • Advanced placement examinations are standardized tests offered by the College Board that allow high school students to earn college credit. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

public institutions of higher education

Public colleges and universities must adopt, publish, and annually report policies regarding advanced placement credit acceptance and justify any score requirements above 3.

Directly affected

college students

Students attending public institutions gain established guidelines for earning degree credits from advanced placement examination scores of 3 or higher.

Directly affected

department of higher education

The department must provide guidance on score justifications, publish institutional credit policies online, and participate in annual policy reviews.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What advanced placement exam scores are required to be accepted for college credit?
Public institutions of higher education must adopt policies accepting advanced placement scores of 3, 4, and 5 for degree requirements.
Can a public college in Massachusetts require a score higher than 3 on an advanced placement exam?
An institution cannot require a score higher than 3 unless the chief academic officer provides evidence that the higher score is necessary for success in a related or more advanced course.
Where can students find the specific credit policies for each institution?
Institutions must post their policies and procedures on their website under the admission category, and summaries are also posted on the Department of Higher Education's website.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Jun 23, 2025Senate
    Accompanied a new draft, see S2536
  2. Apr 29, 2025Joint
    Hearing scheduled for 05/05/2025 from 01:00 PM-05:00 PM in A-1
  3. Feb 27, 2025House
    House concurred
  4. Feb 27, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to the committee on Higher Education

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference90% confidence

Companion Draft History

The bill was accompanied by a new draft, S2536, reflecting legislative processing of the petition.

Connected Entities

Pavel Payano, University of Massachusetts, Mike Moore and 2 more
PersonPavel Payano“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 944”Map →
OrganizationUniversity of Massachusetts“Public university system subject to board review requirements under the bill”Map →
PersonMike Moore“Lead sponsor of Senate Bill 944”Map →
PersonHannah Kane“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 944”Map →
PersonMark Montigny“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 944”Map →

Sources

Open source document

malegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record