POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
Finance Detected

Senate Hearing on Marine Debris and Wildlife Impacts

Original title: MARINE DEBRIS AND WILDLIFE: IMPACTS, SOURCES, AND SOLUTIONS

January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Finance Connection

Notable money activity
$5,000across 1 reported contribution
Trace money trail →
CandidateDonorAmountIndustryDate
ALASKANS FOR DAN SULLIVANR SENATE PAC$5,000-Dec 2024

Reported financial relationships and timing signals. This does not prove motive or influence. Readers draw their own conclusions.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing serves as a formal record of legislative inquiry into marine pollution, which informs future federal policy, funding for coastal cleanup, and waste management regulations affecting coastal states.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Coastal States

These regions experience the physical accumulation of marine debris on their shores.

Wildlife populations

Marine animals are impacted by the presence of debris in their habitats.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2016 Senate subcommittee hearing focused on the sources, environmental impacts, and potential solutions regarding . The hearing examined how debris—ranging from everyday litter to large-scale disaster waste—affects wildlife and coastal ecosystems.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on May 17, 2016, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
  • The subcommittee examined the impact of marine debris on wildlife and potential solutions.
  • Marine debris sources identified include derelict fishing gear, poor solid waste management, major storm events, and everyday litter.
  • The 2011 Japanese tsunami resulted in millions of tons of debris entering the Pacific Ocean.
  • Specific debris incidents cited include a 185-ton dock washing up on the Washington coast and a ghost ship sunk off the coast of Alaska.
  • The hearing included testimony from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, environmental engineering experts, and non-profit organizations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to investigate the sources of , its impact on wildlife, and to discuss potential solutions for coastal states.
What are the primary sources of marine debris mentioned?
Sources include , inadequate solid waste management, major storm events, and general litter.

Why It Matters

The hearing serves as a formal record of legislative inquiry into marine pollution, which informs future federal policy, funding for coastal cleanup, and waste management regulations affecting coastal states.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference90% confidence

Disaster-Driven Debris

The hearing highlights how singular natural disasters, like the 2011 tsunami, create long-term, multi-year waste management challenges for distant coastal nations.

Connected Entities

personJonathan StoneExecutive Director, Save the BayMap →
personJim KurthDeputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceMap →
personDan SullivanChairman of the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Water, and WildlifeMap →
personNicholas MallosDirector, Trash Free Seas Program, Ocean ConservancyMap →
organizationSubcommittee on Fisheries, Water, and WildlifeSenate subcommittee conducting the hearingMap →
personChris PallisterPresident and Co-Founder, Gulf of Alaska KeeperMap →
personJenna JambeckAssociate Professor of Environmental Engineering, University of GeorgiaMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment15
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record