POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Proposed 'Subpoena Abuse Prevention Act'

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6339

Record date · June 24, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This proposed amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act would restrict how government agencies use subpoenas to obtain phone and app-based records. It aims to prevent the bulk collection of data and prohibits using subpoenas to target constitutionally protected activities like free speech or religious practice.

Why it matters

If enacted, this amendment would change the legal requirements for federal agencies seeking digital records, requiring them to certify that subpoenas are not targeting protected speech and mandating public reporting on the use of s.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Federal governmental entities

These agencies must provide new certifications for subpoenas and publish annual reports on their use of administrative subpoenas.

Directly affected

Service providers

These companies receive new guidance on their rights to notify customers about subpoenas and their obligations regarding government disclosures.

Directly affected

General public

Individuals whose digital records are subject to government subpoenas gain new protections against the targeting of constitutionally protected activities.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill stop the government from ever getting my phone records?
No. It requires that subpoenas for such records identify the specific subscriber and prohibits using subpoenas to target constitutionally protected activities like free speech or religious practice.
Can a service provider tell me if the government has subpoenaed my data?
Yes, under this proposal, service providers are generally allowed to notify customers of a subpoena and consult with an attorney, unless a court has issued a specific order preventing that disclosure.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Increased Transparency for Administrative Subpoenas

The amendment introduces a new requirement for federal agencies to publicly report the volume and statutory basis of their administrative subpoenas, a move toward greater oversight of non-judicial data requests.

Connected Entities

Ron Wyden, Department of Defense, Department of Energy and 2 more
PersonRon Wyden“U.S. Senator who submitted the amendment.”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Defense“Agency affected by the underlying bill S. 4784.”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Energy“Agency affected by the underlying bill S. 4784.”Map →
OrganizationGovernment Publishing Office“Publisher of the Congressional Record.”Map →
PersonMs. Lummis“U.S. Senator who co-sponsored the amendment.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record