The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Congressional Hearing on Iran Nuclear Deal Implementation
Record date · January 1, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
The House Committee on Foreign Affairs held a hearing on May 25, 2016, to review the implementation of the Iran nuclear agreement. Witnesses from the State Department and Treasury Department provided testimony regarding the administration's oversight of the deal and ongoing concerns about Iranian activities.
This hearing examines how the U.S. government is enforcing the Iran nuclear agreement and managing , which directly impacts U.S. foreign policy, national security strategy, and international relations with Iran.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
U.S. Department of State
The agency is responsible for coordinating the implementation of the Iran nuclear agreement.
U.S. Department of the Treasury
The agency manages the Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, which oversees sanctions enforcement.
House Committee on Foreign Affairs
The committee is responsible for legislative oversight of the executive branch's foreign policy actions.
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on May 25, 2016, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The hearing focused on the implementation of the Iran nuclear agreement four months after it began.
- Chairman Royce cited reports of Iranian ballistic missile testing and human rights concerns as primary areas of oversight.
- The committee heard testimony from officials representing the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
Show all 8 facts
- The hearing included a discussion on the 'sunset clause' of the nuclear agreement.
- The committee reviewed the administration's approach to enforcing non-nuclear sanctions related to terrorism and human rights.
- Written statements were submitted by Stephen D. Mull, Thomas M. Countryman, and Adam J. Szubin.
- The hearing record includes supplemental letters and questions from committee members including Mark Meadows, Gerald E. Connolly, and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Sanctions Enforcement Debate
The hearing highlights a conflict between the committee's expectation of full sanctions enforcement and the administration's approach to non-nuclear sanctions post-agreement.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy75Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment40Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools