POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Hearing on Class Action Lawsuits Against Intermediate Care Facilities

Original title: EXAMINING CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS AGAINST INTERMEDIATE CARE FACILITIES FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES (ICF/IID)

January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing examines the legal and policy landscape for facilities serving over 100,000 individuals with intellectual disabilities, impacting how these facilities are funded, regulated, and defended against litigation.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Individuals with intellectual disabilities

These individuals are the primary recipients of care in ICF/IID facilities and are subject to the outcomes of litigation and policy shifts regarding their care settings.

ICF/IID facility operators

These organizations are the targets of class action lawsuits and are subject to federal regulations and Medicaid funding requirements.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2018 House Judiciary subcommittee hearing regarding class action lawsuits filed against Intermediate Care Facilities for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities (s). The hearing explored the tension between institutional care models and the shift toward community-based services for individuals with disabilities.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on March 6, 2018, by the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice.
  • ICF/IIDs are institutional facilities providing health and rehabilitative services to individuals with intellectual disabilities.
  • The ICF/IID program serves over 100,000 individuals nationwide.
  • All participants in the ICF/IID program must qualify for Medicaid assistance.
  • Every state in the U.S. operates at least one ICF/IID facility.
  • The hearing addressed a national ideological shift away from institutional care toward community-based services.
  • The Supreme Court case Olmstead v. L.C. (1999) is cited as a foundational legal precedent regarding the placement of individuals with disabilities.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an ICF/IID?
It is an Intermediate Care Facility for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities, which provides institutional health and rehabilitative services to those who qualify for Medicaid.
Who does the ICF/IID program serve?
It serves over 100,000 individuals with intellectual disabilities, many of whom have additional conditions such as seizure disorders, mental illness, or physical impairments.

Why It Matters

The hearing examines the legal and policy landscape for facilities serving over 100,000 individuals with intellectual disabilities, impacting how these facilities are funded, regulated, and defended against litigation.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Institutional to Community Shift

The hearing highlights a documented national trend moving away from institutional care models toward community-based services for individuals with disabilities.

Connected Entities

personPeter KinzlerWitness, father and attorneyMap →
personAlison BarkoffWitness, sister and co-chair of Consortium of Citizens with DisabilitiesMap →
personMartha BryantWitness, mother and RNMap →
personSteve KingChairman of the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil JusticeMap →
personCaroline LahrmannWitness, mother and former president of VORMap →
organizationCenters for Medicare and Medicaid ServicesFederal agency providing data on ICF/IID program participantsMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record