POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
Finance Detected

Congressional Hearing on ACA Cost Sharing Reduction Funding

Original title: THE ACA'S COST SHARING REDUCTION PROGRAM: RAMIFICATIONS OF THE ADMINISTRATION'S DECISION ON THE SOURCE OF FUNDING FOR THE CSR PROGRAM

January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Finance Connection

Notable money activity
$10,678across 20 reported contributions
Trace money trail →
CandidateDonorAmountIndustryDate
Committee to Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020City of Burbank$1,178-Jan 2021
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020Anthony Portantino$500State SenatorSep 2020
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020Anthony Portantino$500State SenatorSep 2020
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020Ca Apt Assoc$500-Sep 2020
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020Karol Boloorchi$500RetiredAug 2020
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020Dave Golonski$500RetiredJun 2020
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020John Tallichet$500General ManagerAug 2020
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020Ca Apt Assoc$500-Sep 2020
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020William Wiggins$500RetiredSep 2020
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020Ca Apt Assoc$500-Sep 2020
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020Ca Apt Assoc$500-Sep 2020
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles$500-Sep 2020
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020Anthony Portantino$500State SenatorSep 2020
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020Anthony Portantino$500State SenatorSep 2020
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles$500-Sep 2020
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles$500-Sep 2020
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles$500-Sep 2020
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020Marsha Ramos$500OwnerAug 2020
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020Burbank Realtors' Assoc$500-Sep 2020
Committee to Re-Elect Tim Murphy to Burbank City Council 2020Anthony Portantino$500State SenatorSep 2020

Reported financial relationships and timing signals. This does not prove motive or influence. Readers draw their own conclusions.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing addressed the legality of federal payments made to insurance companies to lower out-of-pocket costs for low-income enrollees, which directly impacts the stability of health insurance markets and federal spending.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Insurance companies

These companies receive CSR payments from the federal government to offset the costs of providing reduced-cost plans to consumers.

Low-income ACA enrollees

These individuals rely on CSR payments to lower their out-of-pocket healthcare expenses.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2016 House subcommittee hearing regarding the Obama Administration's decision on how to fund the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) program. The hearing examined the legal and financial implications of the administration's funding source for these payments.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on July 8, 2016, by the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
  • The subject was the administration's decision regarding the source of funding for the ACA's Cost Sharing Reduction (CSR) program.
  • The CSR program is designed to reduce out-of-pocket costs for eligible individuals enrolled in ACA marketplace plans.
  • The hearing featured testimony from four expert witnesses representing various policy institutes and legal perspectives.
  • The subcommittee examined whether the executive branch had the constitutional authority to fund the CSR program without specific congressional appropriation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Cost Sharing Reduction (CSR) program?
It is a program under the Affordable Care Act that provides financial assistance to lower out-of-pocket costs, such as deductibles and copayments, for eligible low-income individuals.
Why was this hearing held?
The subcommittee held the hearing to investigate the administration's decision-making process regarding the source of funding for CSR payments and to debate the legal authority behind those funding decisions.

Why It Matters

The hearing addressed the legality of federal payments made to insurance companies to lower out-of-pocket costs for low-income enrollees, which directly impacts the stability of health insurance markets and federal spending.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Executive vs. Legislative Funding Dispute

The hearing highlights a significant tension between the executive branch's implementation of the ACA and the legislative branch's power of the purse.

Connected Entities

personMorton RosenbergWitness, Legislative ConsultantMap →
personDoug BadgerWitness, Senior Fellow at the Galen InstituteMap →
organizationHouse Committee on Energy and CommerceCongressional committee overseeing the hearingMap →
personDiana DeGetteRanking Member of the SubcommitteeMap →
personTom MillerWitness, Resident Fellow at the American Enterprise InstituteMap →
personSimon LazarusWitness, Senior Counsel at The Constitutional Accountability CenterMap →
personTim MurphyChairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight and InvestigationsMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record