The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Congressional Hearing on ACA Cost Sharing Reduction Funding
Record date · January 1, 2017
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This document is a transcript of a 2016 House subcommittee hearing regarding the Obama Administration's decision on how to fund the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) program. The hearing examined the legal and financial implications of the administration's funding source for these payments.
The hearing addressed the legality of federal payments made to insurance companies to lower out-of-pocket costs for low-income enrollees, which directly impacts the stability of health insurance markets and federal spending.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Insurance companies
These companies receive CSR payments from the federal government to offset the costs of providing reduced-cost plans to consumers.
Low-income ACA enrollees
These individuals rely on CSR payments to lower their out-of-pocket healthcare expenses.
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on July 8, 2016, by the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
- The subject was the administration's decision regarding the source of funding for the ACA's Cost Sharing Reduction (CSR) program.
- The CSR program is designed to reduce out-of-pocket costs for eligible individuals enrolled in ACA marketplace plans.
- The hearing featured testimony from four expert witnesses representing various policy institutes and legal perspectives.
Show all 5 facts
- The subcommittee examined whether the executive branch had the constitutional authority to fund the CSR program without specific congressional appropriation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Cost Sharing Reduction (CSR) program?
Why was this hearing held?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Executive vs. Legislative Funding Dispute
The hearing highlights a significant tension between the executive branch's implementation of the ACA and the legislative branch's power of the purse.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance80How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy85Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools