POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofNavy →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

House Subcommittee Hearing on Future U.S. Navy Force Structure

Original title: [H.A.S.C. No. 116-83] Future Force Structure Requirements for the United States Navy

Record date · January 1, 2022

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This transcript documents the first official proceeding of the House Armed Services Committee since March 2020, held to discuss future requirements for the U.S. Navy. The hearing served as a procedural step required by new House rules to allow the committee to proceed with the of the National Defense Authorization Act ().

Why it matters

This hearing was a mandatory procedural milestone required for the committee to begin the formal process for the annual National Defense Authorization Act, which sets the budget and policy priorities for the U.S. military.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

U.S. Navy

The hearing focused on determining the future force structure requirements for the Navy.

Directly affected

House Armed Services Committee members

Members were required to participate in this proceeding to satisfy procedural rules for the upcoming NDAA markup.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on June 4, 2020, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • This was the first official proceeding of the House Armed Services Committee since early March 2020.
  • The hearing was conducted under new House rules adopted May 15, 2020, allowing for remote participation.
  • Committees are required to conduct two official proceedings before they can move to the markup of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).
Show all 6 facts
  • This hearing counted as one of the two required proceedings for the Armed Services Committee.
  • The subcommittee utilized new technology protocols to facilitate remote participation by members.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was this hearing held?
It was held to discuss future Navy force structure requirements and to satisfy a procedural requirement for the committee to begin the of the National Defense Authorization Act.
How did members participate in the hearing?
Members participated both in-person and remotely using technology, following new House rules adopted on May 15, 2020.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Remote Legislative Proceedings

The document highlights the shift to remote committee proceedings in June 2020 due to COVID-19, marking a significant change in House operational procedure.

Connected Entities

Bryan Clark, Joe Courtney, Robert J. Wittman and 3 more
PersonBryan Clark“Senior Fellow at the Hudson Institute”Map →
PersonJoe Courtney“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces”Map →
PersonRobert J. Wittman“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee”Map →
PersonGary Roughead“Former Chief of Naval Operations”Map →
PersonRonald O'Rourke“Specialist for National Defense at the Congressional Research Service”Map →
OrganizationSubcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces“The committee conducting the hearing”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record