Senate Review of State Department Training Facility Costs
January 1, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing addresses a decision to spend $461 million on a new facility instead of an alternative that auditors estimated would save taxpayers $188 million immediately and $812 million over a decade.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
U.S. Department of State
The agency responsible for the construction and operation of the new diplomatic security training facility.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
The agency that reviewed the proposals and made the final decision to approve the Virginia site.
Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC)
The agency that proposed an alternative expansion of its existing facilities in Georgia.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The State Department received approval to build a new training facility at Fort Pickett, Virginia, at a cost of $461 million.
- The approved $461 million plan excludes classroom-based soft skills training, dormitories, and a cafeteria.
- An alternative proposal to expand the existing Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) in Glynco, Georgia, was estimated to cost $273 million.
- OMB auditors recommended the FLETC option, citing immediate savings of $188 million.
- The FLETC option was projected to save $812 million over 10 years compared to the State Department's plan.
- The State Department's original 2012 master plan for a consolidated training facility was estimated at $950 million, later reduced to $907 million.
- The State Department has been attempting to consolidate 19 separate diplomatic security training facilities since 1993.
Why It Matters
The hearing addresses a decision to spend $461 million on a new facility instead of an alternative that auditors estimated would save taxpayers $188 million immediately and $812 million over a decade.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did the Senate hold this hearing?
What is the difference in cost between the two proposals?
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Overriding Auditor Recommendations
The Director of the OMB chose a more expensive construction plan despite internal auditors explicitly recommending a cheaper alternative that offered more capabilities.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy75Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment40Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools