POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Pennsylvania bans speculative ticket sales and deceptive reseller domain names

Original title: An Act amending the act of December 17, 1968 (P.L.1224, No.387), known as the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, prohibiting speculative ticketing acts or practices.

Last action · June 6, 2025: Referred to CONSUMER PROTECTION AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE, June 6, 2025Sponsors: Rob Matzie and 39 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Pennsylvania prohibits ticket resellers and secondary platforms from listing or selling tickets before an official presale or onsale occurs, unless authorized by the . The measure bans secondary platforms from using deceptive domain names, trademarks, or website layouts that mimic official event organizers. The Attorney General can enforce the rules, and injured venues or performers can sue for actual damages plus $1,000 per violation.

Why it matters

Event organizers, venues, and primary s gain new legal tools to sue unauthorized secondary sellers for damages and statutory penalties, while s face strict website design restrictions and inventory requirements.

Background
  • The Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law serves as Pennsylvania's principal consumer protection statute, granting enforcement powers to the Attorney General. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

ticket resellers

Resellers must verify ticket details, hold possession or a contract, and wait for official presales before advertising or selling tickets.

Directly affected

secondary ticket platforms

Platforms are prohibited from publishing unauthorized ticket listings prior to official primary sales and must alter website URLs and branding that mimic rights holders.

Directly affected

operators and venues

Venues and event operators gain the right to file private lawsuits to recover actual damages and statutory penalties against violators.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is speculative ticketing under this bill?
Speculative ticketing involves a reseller advertising, offering for sale, or contracting to resell a ticket before an official presale or onsale has occurred, or when the reseller does not have possession, , or a written contract to obtain the ticket.
Can secondary ticket platforms use team or performer names in their web addresses?
No, s cannot use a domain name, subdomain name, or URL containing the name of a specific , operator, team, or performer, or a trademark not owned by the platform, unless explicitly authorized.
What penalties can injured venues or performers recover against illegal ticket sellers?
Injured operators, venues, s, or primary ticket platforms can sue to recover actual damages plus $1,000 for each violation regarding each ticket sold, along with costs and reasonable attorney fees.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

11 actions
  1. Jun 6, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to CONSUMER PROTECTION AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE, June 6, 2025
  2. Jun 6, 2025Senate
    In the Senate
  3. Jun 4, 2025HouseFloor
    Third consideration and final passage, June 4, 2025 (191-11)
  4. Jun 4, 2025HouseCommittee
    Re-reported as committed, June 4, 2025
  5. Jun 3, 2025House
    Re-committed to APPROPRIATIONS, June 3, 2025
  6. Jun 3, 2025HouseFloor
    Second consideration, June 3, 2025
Show 5 earlier actions
  1. Jun 2, 2025House
    Removed from table, June 2, 2025
  2. May 6, 2025House
    Laid on the table, May 6, 2025
  3. May 6, 2025HouseIntroduced
    First consideration, May 6, 2025
  4. May 6, 2025HouseCommittee
    Reported as committed, May 6, 2025
  5. Feb 4, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to CONSUMER PROTECTION, TECHNOLOGY AND UTILITIES, Feb. 4, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Show 35 more sponsors
GROVEHouse · District 196RCosponsorNo profile match

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of Unfair Trade Practices Law

The bill integrates speculative ticketing enforcement directly into Pennsylvania's existing Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, empowering both the Attorney General and private plaintiffs.

Connected Entities

Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law
otherUnfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law“The existing law being amended by House Bill 463”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.palegis.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record