POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Senate Hearing on the Political and Economic Crisis in Venezuela

Original title: DEEPENING POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC CRISIS IN VENEZUELA: IMPLICATIONS FOR U.S. INTER- ESTS AND THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE

January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing serves as a formal record of Congressional oversight regarding U.S. foreign policy and potential sanctions or diplomatic responses to the instability in Venezuela.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Venezuelan citizens

The population is experiencing shortages of food, medicine, and basic goods.

U.S. Department of State

The agency is responsible for managing diplomatic relations and policy responses to the crisis.

U.S. Department of the Treasury

The Office of Foreign Assets Control manages economic sanctions and financial oversight related to foreign entities.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2015 U.S. Senate hearing regarding the deteriorating political and economic situation in Venezuela. Senators and expert witnesses discussed the implications of the crisis for U.S. interests and the broader Western Hemisphere.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on March 17, 2015, by the Senate Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere, Transnational Crime, Civilian Security, Democracy, Human Rights, and Global Women's Issues.
  • The hearing focused on the political and economic crisis in Venezuela, specifically shortages of food, medicine, and basic goods.
  • Senator Marco Rubio noted that the Venezuelan government had implemented fingerprint scanners in supermarkets to enforce food rationing.
  • Assistant Secretary of State Roberta Jacobson was invited but did not attend due to travel in Havana.
  • The hearing included testimony from officials at the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
  • Expert witnesses included representatives from the Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights, IBI Consultants, and Columbia University.
  • A written statement from a Venezuelan citizen, Maria Eugenia Tovar, was submitted for the record.

Why It Matters

The hearing serves as a formal record of Congressional oversight regarding U.S. foreign policy and potential sanctions or diplomatic responses to the instability in Venezuela.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
To examine the political and economic crisis in Venezuela and its impact on U.S. interests and the Western Hemisphere.
Who testified at the hearing?
Officials from the State Department and Treasury Department, along with experts from human rights organizations and academia.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 3 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Venezuelan Economic Instability

The hearing highlights a shift toward addressing the humanitarian and economic aspects of the Venezuelan crisis, such as food rationing, rather than solely political concerns.

Connected Entities

personMaria Eugenia TovarVenezuelan citizen who submitted a written statementMap →
personMarco RubioChairman of the Subcommittee on Western HemisphereMap →
personRoberta JacobsonAssistant Secretary of StateMap →
personDouglas FarahPresident, IBI ConsultantsMap →
personChristopher SabatiniAdjunct Professor, Columbia UniversityMap →
personJohn SmithActing Director of the Office of Foreign Assets ControlMap →
personSantiago CantonExecutive Director, Partners for Human RightsMap →
personAlex LeeDeputy Assistant Secretary for South America and CubaMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record