
NewsMyNewsLANovember 4, 2026Los Angeles County
Early California Election Returns Show Voter ID and Wealth Tax Measures Trailing
Photo: MyNewsLA
Early statewide returns from Tuesday evening show California voters rejecting Proposition 39, which would mandate voter identification for in-person and mail-in voting, and Proposition 40, which would levy a one-time wealth tax on billionaires. The partial results from 10,597 of 23,860 precincts also show leads for measures involving housing bonds, rainy-day fund caps, permanent income taxes for high earners, and several other ballot initiatives.
Read the full story at MyNewsLAWhy It Matters
The outcome of these statewide ballot measures will directly alter voting procedures, tax obligations for high-income earners and billionaires, state borrowing capacity, and funding streams for health care, education, and housing across California.
Key Facts
- Proposition 39 (voter ID) was trailing 59.0% to 41.0% in early returns with 10,597 of 23,860 precincts reporting.
- Proposition 40 (billionaire wealth tax) was trailing 56.7% to 43.3% in early returns.
- Proposition 39 would require in-person voters to show identification and mail-in voters to provide the last four digits of a government-issued ID number.
- Proposition 40 would levy a one-time wealth tax on California billionaire residents as of January 1, 2026, due in 2027.
- Proposition 40 revenue would be split 90% for health care and 10% for education, food assistance, and administration, with an estimated $100 billion raised from roughly 200 billionaires.
- Propositions 41 and 42 are tied to Proposition 40 and could nullify it if they receive more affirmative votes.
- Proposition 41 would require audits of programs funded by special-tax initiatives and bar new exempt state taxes.
- Proposition 42 would prohibit new state taxes on retirement holdings and personal savings.
- Proposition 1 (housing bonds totaling $11.25 billion) was leading 58.9% to 41.1%.
- Proposition 2 (increasing the rainy-day fund cap from 10% to 20%) was leading 59.4% to 40.6%.
- Proposition 3 (making permanent the top income tax rates for the wealthiest 2%) was leading 58.4% to 41.6%.
- Proposition 4 (public campaign financing for state and local offices) was trailing 52.2% to 47.8%.
Who's Mentioned
OrganizationLeague of Women Voters of California“Organization opposing Proposition 39”OrganizationLegislative Analyst's Office“Nonpartisan fiscal analysis agency”OrganizationCalifornia Taxpayers Association“Organization opposing public campaign financing”OrganizationSEIU-United Healthcare Workers West“Sponsor of the Yes on 40 campaign”OrganizationReform California“Organization supporting Proposition 39”OrganizationHoward Jarvis Taxpayers Association“Organization opposing bond measures and tax extensions”PersonCarl DeMaio“Assemblyman and chair of Reform California”PersonAndres Gonzalez“Health care worker from Maywood”PersonJenny Farrell“Executive director of the League of Women Voters of California”PersonAnn-Louise Kuhns“President and CEO of the California Children's Hospital Association”OrganizationCalifornia Children's Hospital Association“Organization opposing Proposition 40”
