POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah Regulates Frontier AI Models, Requires Safety Plans and Whistleblower Protections Under HB 286

Original title: Artificial Intelligence Transparency Amendments

Last action · March 6, 2026: House/ filedSponsors: Doug Fiefia and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Utah HB 286 establishes the AI Transparency Act, requiring large frontier artificial intelligence developers to publish public safety and child protection plans, report safety incidents to the state, and protect employee whistleblowers from adverse action starting May 6, 2026.

Why it matters

Large AI developers face civil penalties up to $3,000,000 for statutory violations, while employees gain legal remedies including double back pay for retaliation, and the state creates a restricted account funded by penalties to enforce compliance.

Background
  • The Office of Artificial Intelligence Policy was established under prior Utah legislation to oversee and guide artificial intelligence adoption and regulation within the state. context
  • Rep. Doug Fiefia serves as the chief sponsor of House Bill 286 during the 2026 General Session of the Utah Legislature. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Large frontier developers

Must publish public safety and child protection plans, report safety incidents within 15 days, and face civil penalties up to $3,000,000 for violations.

Directly affected

Employees of frontier developers

Receive whistleblower protections against adverse employment actions and can sue for damages, reinstatement, and double back pay if retaliated against.

Directly affected

Office of Artificial Intelligence Policy

Empowered to establish reporting rules, receive incident reports, and prepare annual legislative assessments regarding frontier artificial intelligence models.

Directly affected

Minors

Protected by mandatory child protection plans and risk assessments for covered chatbots with over 1,000,000 monthly active users.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which artificial intelligence developers are subject to the public safety plan requirements?
Large frontier developers, defined as developers with annual revenues of at least $500,000,000 who trained a using at least 10^26 computing operations, must write and publish public safety and child protection plans.
What happens if a large frontier developer violates the transparency act?
The developer is subject to civil penalties recovered by the attorney general, not exceeding $1,000,000 for a first violation and up to $3,000,000 for subsequent violations.
How are employees protected if they report safety violations?
Frontier developers are prohibited from taking adverse employment action against employees who lawfully report safety threats to the office or through internal processes. Employees who experience violations may sue for injunctive relief, actual damages, reinstatement, and twice the amount of back pay.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · on the House floor.

Procedural history

23 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ strike enacting clause
  3. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ 3rd Reading Calendar to Rules
  4. Feb 5, 2026House
    House/ circled
  5. Feb 5, 2026House
    House/ 3rd reading
  6. Feb 4, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0286S01
Show 17 earlier actions
  1. Feb 2, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0286S01
  2. Jan 28, 2026House
    House/ 2nd reading
  3. Jan 28, 2026House
    House/ comm rpt/ substituted
  4. Jan 27, 2026House
    House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  5. Jan 27, 2026House
    House Comm - Substitute Recommendation
  6. Jan 27, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0286S01
  7. Jan 27, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0286S01
  8. Jan 26, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
  9. Jan 23, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  10. Jan 23, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0286
  11. Jan 21, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0286
  12. Jan 20, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  13. Jan 20, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  14. Jan 19, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0286
  15. Jan 19, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0286
  16. Jan 19, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  17. Jan 19, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

State-Level Frontier AI Regulation

Utah establishes specialized compliance rules, risk assessment publications, and a restricted enforcement account targeted specifically at large artificial intelligence developers.

Connected Entities

Office of Artificial Intelligence Policy, Doug Fiefia, Office of the Attorney General and 2 more
OrganizationOffice of Artificial Intelligence Policy“Receives safety incident reports and administers policy”Map →
PersonDoug Fiefia“Chief Sponsor of HB 286”Map →
OrganizationOffice of the Attorney General“Recovers civil penalties and enforces civil actions”Map →
PersonMichael K. McKell“Senate Sponsor of HB 286”Map →
OrganizationAI Transparency Enforcement Restricted Account“Restricted account created within the General Fund to fund enforcement activitie”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz80
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record