New Transparency Rules for Selling or Exchanging State Conservation Lands
April 23, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Current status: signed.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
Residents and stakeholders will now have a 30-day public notice period to review the rationale and details behind proposed sales or exchanges of public conservation lands, which were previously subject to less transparent review processes.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Division of State Lands
Must now manage new website publication requirements and formalize review processes for land exchanges.
Water Management Districts
Governing boards must now follow new 30-day public notice requirements for the sale or exchange of conservation lands.
Conservation land owners/users
Public and private entities requesting to surplus or exchange lands must now comply with new appraisal and review procedures.
Current stage: signed.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much notice will the public get before a conservation land sale?
What information must be provided to the public?
Does this apply to all state land?
Why It Matters
Residents and stakeholders will now have a 30-day public notice period to review the rationale and details behind proposed sales or exchanges of public conservation lands, which were previously subject to less transparent review processes.
News Coverage
Lobbying Activity
CAVES AND ASSOCIATES JOSEPH
on behalf of AMERICAN LAND CONSERVANCY
CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, INC.
on behalf of ART INTO ACRES
CARLYLE CONSULTING
on behalf of LYTTON RANCHERIA
Voting Record
Third Reading
Total
39
Yes
37
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (39)
Stan McClain
Republican · yes
Ralph Massullo
Republican · yes
Debbie Mayfield
Republican · yes
Danny Burgess
Republican · yes
Keith Truenow
Republican · yes
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · yes
Jay Trumbull
Republican · yes
Mack Bernard
Democratic · yes
Alexis Calatayud
Republican · yes
Ed Hooper
Republican · yes
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Kathleen Passidomo
Republican · yes
Gayle Harrell
Republican · yes
Lori Berman
Democratic · yes
Jennifer Bradley
Republican · yes
Bryan Ávila
Republican · yes
Darryl Rouson
Democratic · yes
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
Don Gaetz
Republican · yes
Ana Maria Rodriguez
Republican · yes
Jason Brodeur
Republican · yes
Joe Gruters
Republican · excused
Ileana Garcia
Republican · yes
Corey Simon
Republican · yes
+ 15 more
Passage, Third Reading
Total
117
Yes
109
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
8
Abstain
0
How they voted (117)
Dean Black
Republican · yes
Dan Daley
Democratic · not voting
Lawrence McClure
Republican · yes
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
Fiona McFarland
Republican · yes
Danny Alvarez
Republican · yes
Christine Hunschofsky
Democratic · yes
Jason Shoaf
Republican · yes
Sam Greco
Republican · yes
Nathan Boyles
Republican · yes
Josie Tomkow
Republican · yes
Felicia Robinson
Democratic · yes
Lindsay Cross
Democratic · yes
Chase Tramont
Republican · yes
Lauren Melo
Republican · yes
Toby Overdorf
Republican · yes
Jennifer Kincart Jonsson
Republican · yes
Chad Johnson
Republican · yes
Lisa Dunkley
Democratic · yes
Dianne Hart-Lowman
Democratic · not voting
John Snyder
Republican · yes
Alex Rizo
Republican · yes
Paula Stark
Republican · yes
Dotie Joseph
Democratic · not voting
+ 93 more
Sponsors
Show 10 more sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Increased Transparency for Land Disposal
The law shifts from internal agency review to a mandatory public-facing website disclosure model for conservation land transactions.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance75How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools