POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on Rail Supply Chain Resilience

Original title: GETTING BACK ON TRACK: EXPLORING RAIL SUPPLY CHAIN RESILIENCE AND CHALLENGES

January 1, 2023

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing serves as a formal record of testimony that informs future federal transportation policy, potential regulatory changes, and legislative priorities regarding the movement of freight across the United States.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Railroad Companies

The industry is subject to potential legislative and regulatory oversight discussed during the hearing.

Transportation Labor Unions

Labor representatives provided testimony regarding workforce conditions and safety standards.

Shippers and Manufacturers

Industries relying on rail for freight movement are impacted by supply chain efficiency and rail service reliability.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2023.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials held a hearing on May 11, 2023, to examine the current state of the U.S. rail supply chain. Industry leaders, labor representatives, and policy analysts provided testimony regarding operational challenges, infrastructure needs, and the resilience of the national rail network.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on May 11, 2023, by the Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials.
  • The session focused on identifying challenges to rail supply chain resilience and exploring potential solutions.
  • Testimony was provided by representatives from the Association of American Railroads, American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association, American Chemistry Council, Reason Foundation, and the Transportation Trades Department, AFL-CIO.
  • The record includes a submission regarding the impact of blocked railroad crossings on public safety.
  • The record includes a letter to the Surface Transportation Board from the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture.

Why It Matters

This hearing serves as a formal record of testimony that informs future federal transportation policy, potential regulatory changes, and legislative priorities regarding the movement of freight across the United States.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was convened to gather expert testimony on the current operational challenges and resilience of the U.S. rail supply chain.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included leaders from major rail industry associations, the chemical industry, transportation policy think tanks, and labor unions.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 2 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference90% confidence

Inter-agency Coordination

The inclusion of a letter from the Secretary of Agriculture to the Surface Transportation Board highlights the intersection of agricultural logistics and rail regulation.

Connected Entities

personMarc ScribnerSenior Transportation Policy Analyst at the Reason FoundationMap →
personTroy E. NehlsChairman of the Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous MaterialsMap →
personChris JahnCEO of the American Chemistry CouncilMap →
personGreg ReganPresident of the Transportation Trades Department, AFL-CIOMap →
personChuck BakerPresident of the American Short Line and Regional Railroad AssociationMap →
personDonald M. Payne, Jr.Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous MateriMap →
personIan JefferiesCEO of the Association of American RailroadsMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record