POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Proposed Senate Amendment Regarding the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6542

Record date · June 24, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Senator Capito and Senator Whitehouse have submitted an amendment to the 2027 defense authorization bill. The amendment expresses the regarding the importance of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the necessity of passing water resources legislation every two years.

Why it matters

This amendment establishes a formal Congressional position on the importance of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the need for water infrastructure legislation, which influences the prioritization and funding of future water projects nationwide.

Background
  • Mrs. Capito and Mr. Whitehouse are U.S. Senators who frequently collaborate on infrastructure and environmental policy. context
  • S. 4784 is the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which sets policy and funding levels for the Department of Defense. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

The amendment formally recognizes the agency's Civil Works mission and advocates for a biennial legislative cycle for its project authorizations.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this amendment actually do?
It expresses the ',' which is a formal statement of opinion or policy preference, but it does not change existing law or mandate specific spending.
What is the status of this amendment?
It has been submitted and ordered to , meaning it is currently awaiting further action or consideration by the Senate.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Emphasis on Biennial Water Legislation

The amendment highlights a specific push to formalize a two-year cycle for water resources development legislation, which would standardize the authorization process for the Corps of Engineers.

Connected Entities

Shelley M Capito, Government Publishing Office, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and 1 more
PersonShelley M Capito“U.S. Senator who submitted the amendment.”Map →
OrganizationGovernment Publishing Office“The agency that publishes the Congressional Record.”Map →
OrganizationU.S. Army Corps of Engineers“The federal agency that is the subject of the sense of Congress resolution.”Map →
PersonMr. Whitehouse“U.S. Senator who co-sponsored the amendment.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record