POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Congressional Hearing: Improving Homeland Security Information Sharing

Original title: FROM BOSTON TO AUSTIN: LESSONS LEARNED ON HOMELAND THREAT INFORMATION SHARING

Record date · January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The House Committee on Homeland Security held a hearing on April 18, 2018, to examine how local and federal law enforcement agencies share threat information. The discussion focused on lessons learned from recent security incidents in Boston and Austin to improve coordination and communication between police departments and federal agencies.

Why it matters

This hearing evaluates the effectiveness of communication channels between local police and federal intelligence agencies, which directly impacts the speed and coordination of responses to public safety threats.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Local Law Enforcement Agencies

These agencies are the primary partners in the information-sharing networks discussed and are subject to the protocols reviewed by the committee.

Directly affected

Federal Intelligence and Law Enforcement Agencies

These agencies are responsible for managing the intelligence databases and communication channels used to coordinate with local police.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on April 18, 2018, in the Capitol Visitor Center.
  • The session focused on 'lessons learned' regarding threat information sharing between local and federal authorities.
  • Witnesses included leadership from the Austin Police Department, Boston Police Department, and the Major Cities Chiefs Association.
  • Federal witnesses included representatives from the FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF).
Show all 6 facts
  • The committee received written testimony and oral statements from two panels of experts.
  • The hearing record includes follow-up questions submitted by Representatives Lou Barletta and Daniel M. Donovan to the police chiefs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
To review how local police departments and federal agencies share information about security threats and to identify ways to improve that process.
Who testified at the hearing?
The hearing featured two panels: one with local police chiefs from Austin, Boston, and Washington D.C., and another with officials from the FBI and the ATF.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift80% confidence

Focus on Local-Federal Integration

The hearing highlights a strategic shift toward integrating local police intelligence into federal homeland security frameworks.

Connected Entities

James E. McDermond, William B. Evans, Peter Newsham and 4 more
PersonJames E. McDermond“Assistant Director at the ATF”Map →
PersonWilliam B. Evans“Commissioner of the Boston Police Department”Map →
PersonPeter Newsham“Chief of the Washington Metropolitan Police Department”Map →
PersonKerry L. Sleeper“Assistant Director at the FBI”Map →
PersonBrian Manley“Chief of the Austin Police Department”Map →
OrganizationCommittee on Homeland Security“House of Representatives committee conducting the hearing”Map →
PersonMichael T. McCaul“Chairman of the Committee on Homeland Security”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record