POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

House Committee Hearing on the Iran Nuclear Agreement

Original title: IMPLICATIONS OF A NUCLEAR AGREEMENT WITH IRAN (PART IV)

Record date · January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript from a 2015 House Committee on Foreign Affairs hearing regarding the implications of the nuclear agreement with Iran. The committee heard testimony from retired military officers and policy experts as Congress prepared to vote on the deal.

Why it matters

The hearing examined the potential impact of the Iran nuclear agreement, specifically regarding the release of approximately $100 billion in frozen assets and the subsequent influence on Iran's military and economic capabilities.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Iranian Government

The agreement provides for the release of frozen assets and reconnection to the global economy.

Directly affected

U.S. Congress

Members were tasked with reviewing the agreement and voting on its implementation.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on September 9, 2015, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • This was the 30th hearing or briefing held by the committee regarding the Iran nuclear negotiations.
  • The agreement provides for approximately $100 billion in immediate sanctions relief to Iran.
  • The agreement allows for the reconnection of Iran to the global economy.
Show all 7 facts
  • Chairman Royce stated that the IRGC and Quds Forces own many major businesses in Iran, which may be impacted by the release of funds.
  • The committee heard testimony from three retired military officers and one policy fellow.
  • The hearing was held in preparation for a scheduled House vote on the agreement that same week.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to assess the implications of the nuclear agreement with Iran before a scheduled Congressional vote.
Who testified at the hearing?
The witnesses included retired General Chuck Wald, retired Admiral William Fallon, retired Vice Admiral John Bird, and Leon Wieseltier from The Brookings Institution.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

High Frequency of Oversight

The committee held 30 hearings or briefings on a single issue, indicating an unusually high level of legislative scrutiny for the Iran nuclear deal.

Connected Entities

John Bird, House Committee on Foreign Affairs, William Fallon and 4 more
PersonJohn Bird“Retired USN Vice Admiral and witness”Map →
OrganizationHouse Committee on Foreign Affairs“Congressional committee conducting the hearing”Map →
PersonWilliam Fallon“Retired USN Admiral and witness”Map →
PersonEdward R. Royce“Chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs”Map →
PersonLeon Wieseltier“Senior Fellow at The Brookings Institution and witness”Map →
PersonChuck Wald“Retired USAF General and witness”Map →
PersonEliot L. Engel“Ranking Member of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance90
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment30
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record