POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Personal Explanation of Missed Vote by Rep. John H. Rutherford

Original title: PERSONAL EXPLANATION

Record date · May 29, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Representative John H. Rutherford (R-FL) submitted a formal statement to the Congressional Record to explain his absence during a on April 22, 2026. He stated that he was attending a committee meeting at the time and indicated how he would have voted had he been present.

Why it matters

This document clarifies the official voting record for Representative Rutherford regarding Roll Call No. 130, ensuring his position on the legislation is documented for public record.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

John H. Rutherford

His official voting record for Roll Call No. 130 is updated with his intended vote.

Key Facts

  • Representative John H. Rutherford was absent for Roll Call Vote No. 130 on April 22, 2026.
  • The absence was due to a concurrent meeting of a House committee.
  • Representative Rutherford stated he would have voted 'YEA' on Roll Call No. 130 if he had been present.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was Representative Rutherford absent for the vote?
He was attending a committee meeting at the time the vote took place.
Does this change the outcome of the vote?
No, this is a for the record and does not alter the official tally of the vote.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

John H. Rutherford
PersonJohn H. Rutherford“U.S. Representative from Florida who missed a vote.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance10
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy0
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment0
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record