POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas Legislature regulates consumable hemp products, sets manufacturer licensing fees at $10,000, and restricts sales to adults 21 and older

Original title: Relating to the regulation of certain products derived from hemp, including consumable hemp products and the hemp-derived cannabinoids contained in those products; requiring occupational licenses and registrations; imposing fees; creating criminal offenses; authorizing an administrative penalty.

Last action · August 20, 2025: Referred to Public HealthSponsors: Charles Perry and 20 others

Companion · HB 6same policy, House version
Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Texas sets strict regulations on s, limiting allowable s strictly to cannabidiol or cannabigerol, imposing a $10,000 processor license fee and a $20,000 annual retail registration fee per location, and prohibiting sales to anyone under 21 years of age.

Why it matters

Business operators face major new compliance costs and licensing fees while individuals face new misdemeanor and felony criminal penalties for possessing, manufacturing, or selling restricted hemp derivatives or marketing products in ways attractive to minors.

Background
  • Consumable hemp products in Texas gained widespread commercial availability following the 2018 federal Farm Bill and subsequent state legislation in 2019. context
  • State lawmakers have increasingly sought to tighten regulatory oversight and age restrictions on intoxicating hemp derivatives sold in retail establishments. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Hemp product manufacturers

Manufacturers must pay a $10,000 initial and renewal licensing fee per location, pay $500 per product registration, comply with strict cannabinoid limits, and print required QR codes and warning labels.

Directly affected

Consumable hemp retailers

Retailers must pay an annual registration fee of $20,000 per location, verify buyer age to ensure customers are 21 or older, grant physical inspection access to law enforcement, and avoid displaying products adjacent to items legal for minors.

Directly affected

Consumers under 21 years of age

Individuals under 21 are legally barred from purchasing consumable hemp products, and marketing or packaging attractive to minors is prohibited.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What cannabinoids are permitted in consumable hemp products under this bill?
s may only contain cannabidiol (CBD) or cannabigerol (CBG). Any amount of any other is strictly prohibited.
How much does it cost a retailer to register a location to sell consumable hemp products?
The owner of a location where s are sold must pay an annual registration fee of $20,000 for each location.
What is the minimum age to purchase consumable hemp products?
Purchasers must be at least 21 years of age, as selling these products to anyone younger than 21 is prohibited.
Are consumable hemp products allowed to be smoked?
No, the manufacturing, distribution, or retail sale of s for smoking is explicitly prohibited.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the Senate · in House committee.

Procedural history

25 actions
  1. Aug 20, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Public Health
  2. Aug 20, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time
  3. Aug 20, 2025House
    Received from the Senate
  4. Aug 19, 2025Senate
    Reported engrossed
  5. Aug 19, 2025Senate
    Reason for vote recorded in Journal
  6. Aug 19, 2025SenateFloor
    Record vote
Show 19 earlier actions
  1. Aug 19, 2025SenateFloor
    Passed
  2. Aug 19, 2025SenateFloor
    Read 3rd time
  3. Aug 19, 2025Senate
    Laid before the Senate
  4. Aug 18, 2025SenateFloor
    Record vote
  5. Aug 18, 2025SenateFloor
    Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  6. Aug 18, 2025SenateFloor
    Record vote
  7. Aug 18, 2025Senate
    Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  8. Aug 15, 2025Senate
    Committee report printed and distributed
  9. Aug 15, 2025SenateCommittee
    Reported favorably w/o amendments
  10. Aug 15, 2025Senate
    Vote taken in committee
  11. Aug 15, 2025Senate
    Testimony taken in committee
  12. Aug 15, 2025Senate
    Considered in public hearing
  13. Aug 15, 2025Senate
    Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  14. Aug 15, 2025SenateFloor
    Record vote
  15. Aug 15, 2025Senate
    Posting rule suspended
  16. Aug 15, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to State Affairs
  17. Aug 15, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Read first time
  18. Aug 15, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Filed
  19. Aug 15, 2025Senate
    Received by the Secretary of the Senate

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Strict Limitation on Cannabinoids

The state transitions from allowing certain delta-9 THC thresholds up to 0.3 percent to restricting consumable hemp products exclusively to cannabidiol or cannabigerol.

Connected Entities

César Blanco, Joan Huffman, Department of Public Safety and 24 more
PersonCésar Blanco“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
PersonJoan Huffman“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Public Safety“State law enforcement agency conducting inspections and managing driver license ”Map →
PersonAngela Paxton“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
PersonRobert Nichols“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
PersonBirdwell“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
PersonChuy Hinojosa“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
PersonCharles Schwertner“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
OrganizationHealth and Human Services Commission“State commission adopting rules and administrative penalties”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Food and Drug Administration“Federal agency recognizing safe hemp ingredients and administering food and drug”Map →
PersonKevin Sparks“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
PersonCreighton“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
PersonLois Kolkhorst“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
PersonBrent Hagenbuch“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
OrganizationTexas Department of Licensing and Regulation“State agency regulating substance misuse education programs”Map →
PersonAdam Hinojosa“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Drug Enforcement Administration“Federal agency registering testing laboratories”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Department of Agriculture“Federal agency receiving approved state plans for hemp regulation”Map →
PersonPaul Bettencourt“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
PersonPete Flores“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
PersonMayes Middleton“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
PersonCharles Perry“Primary sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
PersonPhil King“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
PersonBob Hall“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
PersonTan Parker“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
PersonBryan Hughes“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →
PersonDonna Campbell“Co-sponsor of S.B. No. 6”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 90)
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz75
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record