Senate Roundtable on Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS)
January 1, 2019
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The program establishes federal security requirements for chemical facilities to prevent terrorist attacks, and this hearing served as a formal review process to inform future legislative of these security mandates.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Chemical Facility Operators
These entities must comply with federal security regulations and standards established by the CFATS program.
Department of Homeland Security
The agency is responsible for administering, enforcing, and updating the security standards for chemical facilities.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on June 12, 2018, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
- The CFATS program was originally authorized in 2007 and underwent a reauthorization process in 2014.
- The roundtable included testimony from 9 witnesses representing government agencies, labor unions, and chemical industry associations.
- The committee reviewed the progress and identified problems within the existing security standards framework.
- The hearing record includes written statements from the Chamber of Commerce, National Association of Manufacturers, and other industry groups.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the CFATS program?
Why was this roundtable held?
Why It Matters
The program establishes federal security requirements for chemical facilities to prevent terrorist attacks, and this hearing served as a formal review process to inform future legislative of these security mandates.
News Coverage
Bias ratings based on AllSides / Media Bias/Fact Check
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Iterative Security Improvement
The committee explicitly noted that the 2014 reauthorization was an attempt to fix identified problems from the original 2007 authorization, indicating a pattern of incremental regulatory adjustment.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools