POLISCOPE
Back to feed
CALACCESS COUNTYlobbying

Lobbying Disclosure: Wagerman Associates for San Joaquin Valley Air District

Original title: WAGERMAN ASSOCIATES INC. lobbying for SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

June 20, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This document discloses the financial investment made by a regional air quality agency to influence state-level legislation during the first three months of 2000.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

The agency authorized the expenditure of public funds for lobbying services.

Wagerman Associates Inc.

The firm received payment to perform lobbying activities on behalf of the district.

What changed

Last recorded activity June 20, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

Wagerman Associates Inc. reported activities on behalf of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District for the first quarter of 2000. The firm received $5,906.25 in payments for monitoring and influencing a wide range of state assembly and senate bills.

Key Facts

  • Wagerman Associates Inc. was paid $5,906.25 for lobbying services.
  • The reporting period covers January 1, 2000, through March 31, 2000.
  • The client for these lobbying services is the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District.
  • The firm tracked 15 Assembly Bills (AB 57, 104, 172, 173, 567, 624, 1450, 1560, 1641, 1802, 1877, 2283, 2511, 2576, 2784).
  • The firm tracked 17 Senate Bills (SB 89, 136, 212, 215, 230, 272, 285, 296, 448, 1102, 1146, 1150, 1167, 1175, 1214, 1865, 1991).

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this document?
This is a public disclosure report showing how much a government agency spent on professional services during a specific three-month period.
What specific bills were being lobbied?
The document lists 32 specific pieces of legislation (15 Assembly Bills and 17 Senate Bills) that the firm was monitoring or influencing.

Why It Matters

This document discloses the financial investment made by a regional air quality agency to influence state-level legislation during the first three months of 2000.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

High Volume Legislative Monitoring

The agency monitored 32 separate pieces of legislation in a single quarter, suggesting a high level of engagement with state-level policy changes.

Connected Entities

Sources

Open source document

www.sos.ca.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance30
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record