POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Hearing on Banking Regulations and Economic Growth

Original title: FOSTERING ECONOMIC GROWTH: MIDSIZED, REGIONAL, AND LARGE INSTITUTION PERSPECTIVE

January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing explores potential legislative changes to banking regulations that could alter compliance costs and operational requirements for midsize and regional banks, which directly impacts how these institutions lend to consumers and businesses.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Midsize and Regional Banks

These institutions are subject to regulatory requirements that the committee is evaluating for potential reform.

Financial Regulators

These agencies are responsible for implementing and enforcing the rules discussed by the committee.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2017 Senate Banking Committee hearing regarding the regulatory environment for midsize, regional, and large financial institutions. The committee discussed whether current post-crisis regulations, such as stress testing and the , are appropriately tailored to the actual risk profiles of these banks.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on June 15, 2017, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
  • The committee examined the impact of post-crisis regulations on midsize, regional, and large financial institutions.
  • Chairman Crapo stated that current asset-based thresholds for regulations do not always reflect the actual systemic risk of a bank.
  • The committee discussed the $10 billion asset threshold for company-run stress tests, with some participants suggesting it is too low.
  • The CCAR (Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review) process was identified as a costly and time-consuming burden for noncomplex regional banks.
  • The Volcker rule was cited as being overly complicated to implement and difficult to comply with.
  • The committee is considering bipartisan legislation to improve the bank regulatory framework.
  • Witnesses included representatives from Zions Bancorporation, The Clearing House Association, South State Corporation, and Cornell University.

Why It Matters

The hearing explores potential legislative changes to banking regulations that could alter compliance costs and operational requirements for midsize and regional banks, which directly impacts how these institutions lend to consumers and businesses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to discuss how current banking regulations affect the growth and operations of midsize and regional banks, and to consider potential reforms.
What specific regulations were mentioned as problematic?
Participants discussed the burden of stress testing requirements, the process, and the complexity of the .

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Regulatory Tailoring

The hearing highlights a clear shift in 2017 toward re-evaluating post-2008 financial regulations to reduce compliance burdens on smaller regional banks.

Connected Entities

personGreg BaerPresident of The Clearing House Association and witnessMap →
personSherrod BrownRanking member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban AffairsMap →
personSaule T. OmarovaProfessor of Law at Cornell University and witnessMap →
personRobert R. Hill, Jr.CEO of South State Corporation and witnessMap →
organizationSenate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban AffairsThe committee conducting the hearingMap →
personHarris H. SimmonsCEO of Zions Bancorporation and witnessMap →
personMike CrapoChairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban AffairsMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record