POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Congressional Hearing on Campus Sexual Assault Prevention

Original title: PREVENTING AND RESPONDING TO SEXUAL ASSAULT ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES

January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing examines how federal regulations influence campus disciplinary processes, legal rights for students, and institutional obligations regarding sexual violence reporting and investigation.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

College and University Administrators

They are responsible for implementing federal Title IX and Clery Act requirements on campus.

Students

They are subject to campus disciplinary procedures and are the intended recipients of institutional safety policies.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is the official record of a 2015 U.S. House subcommittee hearing regarding policies and procedures for preventing and responding to sexual assault at colleges and universities. It includes testimony from university administrators, legal experts, and advocacy groups regarding the implementation of federal mandates like and the .

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on September 10, 2015, before the Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Training.
  • The discussion focused on the intersection of Title IX and the Clery Act in the context of campus sexual assault.
  • The record includes the U.S. Department of Education's 2014 guidance on Title IX and sexual violence.
  • The record includes a list of higher education institutions with open Title IX sexual violation investigations as of 2015.
  • Testimony was provided by representatives from the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, the American Association of University Women, Wake Forest University, and Dickinson College.
  • The subcommittee received formal submissions from the National Alliance to End Sexual Violence, the Feminist Majority Foundation, and the National Domestic Violence Hotline.
  • The record includes questions submitted for the record to Dr. Penny Rue and Ms. Dana Scaduto by Representative Bradley Byrne.

Why It Matters

The hearing examines how federal regulations influence campus disciplinary processes, legal rights for students, and institutional obligations regarding sexual violence reporting and investigation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to review how colleges and universities prevent and respond to sexual assault and to examine the impact of federal regulations on these processes.
Who testified at this hearing?
Witnesses included representatives from the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, the American Association of University Women, Wake Forest University, and Dickinson College.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Title IX Guidance

The hearing highlights the significant role of 2014 Department of Education guidance in shaping campus-level sexual assault policies.

Connected Entities

organizationU.S. Department of EducationProvided guidance on Title IX and lists of institutions under investigationMap →
personDana ScadutoGeneral Counsel, Dickinson CollegeMap →
personLisa M. MaatzVice President for Government Relations, American Association of University WomeMap →
personPenny RueVice President for Campus Life, Wake Forest UniversityMap →
personVirginia FoxxChairwoman of the Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce TrainingMap →
personRuben HinojosaRanking Member of the SubcommitteeMap →
personJoseph CohnLegislative and Policy Director, Foundation for Individual Rights in EducationMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record