POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Louisiana enacts Ivy Daniels Act criminalizing AI-generated deepfakes and nude images of minors

Original title: CRIME: Provides relative to unlawful conduct involving images of another person created by artificial intelligence (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

Last action · June 9, 2026: Effective date: 08/01/2026.Sponsors: Bryan Fontenot and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

Louisiana establishes strict criminal penalties for creating, possessing, selling, or sharing artificial intelligence-generated s and nude images depicting minors or students, while requiring public schools to distribute educational materials on these crimes.

Why it matters

Residents face new felony charges and multi-year prison sentences for possessing or sharing unauthorized AI-generated images of individuals under seventeen, and public school principals must ensure students in grade six and above receive informational notices.

Background
  • House Bill 119 was enacted during the 2026 Regular Session of the Louisiana Legislature and signed into law as Act 782. context
  • The measure establishes specific legal frameworks to address emerging challenges associated with artificial intelligence technology and digital harassment. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Minors and Students

Their legal protections against the creation, possession, and dissemination of unauthorized artificial intelligence-generated intimate images are established and expanded.

Directly affected

Educators

They face an additional two-year consecutive prison sentence enhancement if convicted of committing these offenses against a student.

Directly affected

Public School Principals

They are required to disseminate educational information on AI-related crimes to students in grade six and above and collect signed parental acknowledgment forms.

Not affected

Electronic Mail and Interactive Computer Service Providers

They are explicitly exempted from liability under the new unlawful possession statute.

Key Facts

  • Creates the new crime of unlawful possession of AI-generated images depicting a person under seventeen who is totally nude or in a state of undress, punishable by up to five years with at least one year served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.
  • Increases the penalty for unlawful dissemination or sale of AI images from a maximum of six months and a $750 fine to up to one year imprisonment and a $1,000 fine.
  • Establishes a mandatory two-year consecutive prison sentence enhancement if the offender is an educator and the victim is a student.
  • Requires public school principals to distribute educational information during the first five days of each school year to students in grade six and above regarding AI image dissemination and possession crimes.
Show all 8 facts
  • Requires parents or legal guardians to sign a written form acknowledging receipt and understanding of the AI crime information and return it to the school.
  • Mandates that the Louisiana Department of Education develop the required educational information and provide it to each public school governing authority.
  • Exempts interactive computer services, electronic mail service providers, and telecommunications service providers from liability under the new unlawful possession statute.
  • Applies the new unlawful dissemination, sale, and possession disclosure requirements to charter schools across the state.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the penalty for possessing unauthorized AI-generated nude images of a minor?
A violator faces imprisonment with or without for not more than five years, with at least one year served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.
What are public schools required to do under this law?
Public school principals must distribute age-appropriate educational information during the first five days of the school year to students in grade six and above, and collect signed acknowledgment forms from parents or legal guardians.
Are internet service providers held liable if a user utilizes their service to commit these offenses?
No, the statute explicitly exempts s, electronic mail service providers, and telecommunications or information service providers used by individuals to violate the law.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

43 actions
  1. Jun 9, 2026HouseEnrolled
    Signed by the Governor. Becomes Act No. 782.
  2. Jun 9, 2026House
    Effective date: 08/01/2026.
  3. Jun 4, 2026House
    Sent to the Governor for executive approval.
  4. Jun 1, 2026HouseFloor
    Conference Committee Report read, roll called, yeas 90, nays 0. The Conference Committee Report was adopted.
  5. Jun 1, 2026SenateFloor
    Notice House adopted the Conference Committee Report.
  6. Jun 1, 2026SenateFloor
    Conference Committee Report read; adopted by a vote of 37 yeas and 0 nays.
Show 37 earlier actions
  1. Jun 1, 2026House
    Notice of Senate adoption of Conference Committee Report.
  2. Jun 1, 2026HouseEnrolled
    Enrolled and signed by the Speaker of the House.
  3. Jun 1, 2026SenateEnrolled
    Signed by the President of the Senate on 6/2/2026.
  4. May 31, 2026House
    Conference Committee report received. Lies over under the rules.
  5. May 31, 2026Senate
    Conference committee report received.
  6. May 31, 2026House
    Scheduled for floor debate on 06/01/2026.
  7. May 27, 2026House
    House conferees appointed: Fontenot, Villio, and Boyer.
  8. May 27, 2026Senate
    Notice House Conference Committee members appointed.
  9. May 26, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, roll called, yeas 99, nays 0, Senate amendments rejected, conference committee appointment pending.
  10. May 26, 2026Senate
    Notice House rejected the Senate amendments.
  11. May 26, 2026Senate
    Senate conference committee members appointed: Hodges, Morris, and Kleinpeter.
  12. May 26, 2026House
    Notice of Senate conferees appointed.
  13. May 25, 2026House
    Scheduled for concurrence on 05/26/2026.
  14. May 20, 2026House
    Received from the Senate with amendments.
  15. May 19, 2026Senate
    Rules suspended. Called from the Calendar.
  16. May 19, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate floor amendments read and adopted. Read by title, passed by a vote of 34 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
  17. Apr 27, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate floor amendments read and adopted.
  18. Apr 27, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Read by title and returned to the Calendar, subject to call.
  19. Apr 20, 2026SenateFloor
    Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments. Read by title and passed to third reading and final passage.
  20. Apr 15, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
  21. Apr 14, 2026SenateCommittee
    Reported favorably.
  22. Apr 1, 2026SenateCommittee
    Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary C.
  23. Mar 31, 2026Senate
    Received in the Senate. Rules suspended. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading.
  24. Mar 30, 2026House
    Called from the calendar.
  25. Mar 30, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, amended, returned to the calendar.
  26. Mar 30, 2026House
    Called from the calendar.
  27. Mar 30, 2026HouseFloor
    Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 101, nays 0. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
  28. Mar 24, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, returned to the calendar.
  29. Mar 24, 2026House
    Notice given.
  30. Mar 24, 2026House
    Scheduled for floor debate on 03/30/2026.
  31. Mar 23, 2026HouseFloor
    Read by title, amended, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading.
  32. Mar 23, 2026House
    Scheduled for floor debate on 03/24/2026.
  33. Mar 18, 2026House
    Reported with amendments (12-0).
  34. Mar 9, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.
  35. Feb 13, 2026House
    Prefiled.
  36. Feb 13, 2026HouseCommittee
    Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.
  37. Feb 13, 2026House
    First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 2/13/2026.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift99% confidence

Expansion of AI Crime Statutes

The legislature added a brand-new criminal category for the mere possession of AI-generated intimate images of minors, expanding beyond prior laws that only targeted creation or dissemination.

Connected Entities

Alonzo Knox, Louisiana Department of Education, Bryan Fontenot
PersonAlonzo Knox“Representative who cosponsored House Bill No. 119”Map →
OrganizationLouisiana Department of Education“State agency tasked with developing educational information on AI-related crimes”Map →
PersonBryan Fontenot“Representative who sponsored House Bill No. 119”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.la.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record