POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

South Dakota House Bill 1279 Permits Technical College Employees to Join the State Health Plan

Original title: permit technical college employees to join the state health plan.

Last action · March 5, 2026: Deferred to the 41st legislative daySponsors: Paul Miskimins and 4 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

The South Dakota Legislature permits permanent technical college employees working 20 or more hours a week for at st six months a year to join the state health benefits plan beginning July 1, 2027. Under the measure, the employing technical college contributes an amount no less than the monthly contribution provided by the state for other s and handles payroll deductions instead of the state.

Why it matters

Expands health plan eligibility to technical college personnel while shifting the financial contribution and payroll deduction responsibilities from the state government to the individual technical colleges.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

technical college employees

Permanent technical college employees working 20 or more hours per week become eligible to participate in the state health plan.

Directly affected

technical colleges

Technical colleges must contribute to the system an amount no less than the state monthly contribution and manage salary deductions for plan premiums.

Directly affected

human resources commissioner

The commissioner is responsible for agreeing on plan terms with technical colleges and promulgating rules for participation and administration.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which technical college employees are eligible to join the state health plan?
Permanent employees of a technical college in the state who are scheduled to work twenty or more hours a week, at st six months of each year, are eligible.
Who pays the monthly contribution for participating technical college employees?
The employing technical college contributes an amount no less than the monthly contribution provided by the state for other s, and any costs beyond that amount are paid by the employee through premiums.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the House · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

10 actions
  1. Mar 5, 2026Senate
    Deferred to the 41st legislative day
  2. Mar 5, 2026Senate
    Scheduled for hearing
  3. Feb 25, 2026SenateIntroduced
    First read in Senate and referred to
  4. Feb 24, 2026HouseCommittee
    Do Pass Amended
  5. Feb 23, 2026HouseCommittee
    Do Pass
  6. Feb 23, 2026House
    Scheduled for hearing
Show 4 earlier actions
  1. Feb 20, 2026House
    Referred as Amended to
  2. Feb 20, 2026House
    Motion to amend
  3. Feb 20, 2026House
    Scheduled for hearing
  4. Feb 4, 2026HouseIntroduced
    First read in House and referred to

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Show 3 earlier roll calls
Motion succeededHouse2/24/2026South Dakota LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

Do Pass Amended

Total

70

Yes
63
No
3
Present
0
Not voting
0
Abstain
0
Other positions
4

How they voted (70)

46 more members
Karla LemsParty not recordedyes
Roger DeGrootParty not recordedyes
Amber ArlintParty not recordedyes
John SjaardaParty not recordedyes
Spencer GoschParty not recordedyes
Tim GoodwinParty not recordedyes
Erin HealyParty not recordedyes
Jeff BathkeParty not recordedexcused
Jon HansenParty not recordedyes
Brandei SchaefbauerParty not recordedyes
Tim CzmowskiParty not recordedyes
Mike StevensParty not recordedyes
Mary FitzgeraldParty not recordedyes
Tim ReischParty not recordedyes
Will MortensonParty not recordedyes
Scott OdenbachParty not recordedyes
Peri PourierParty not recordedexcused
Kaley NolzParty not recordedyes
Phil JensenParty not recordedyes
Logan ManhartParty not recordedyes
Steve DuffyParty not recordedyes
David KullParty not recordedyes
Nick FosnessParty not recordedyes
Brian MulderParty not recordedyes
Nicole Uhre-BalkParty not recordedyes
Drew PetersonParty not recordedyes
Jana HuntParty not recordedyes
Tesa SchwansParty not recordedyes
Mellissa HeermannParty not recordedyes
Kadyn WittmanParty not recordedyes
Mike WeisgramParty not recordedyes
Greg JamisonParty not recordedyes
Scott MooreParty not recordedyes
Jessica BahmullerParty not recordedyes
Trish LadnerParty not recordedyes
Eric EmeryParty not recordedyes
Les HeinemannParty not recordedyes
Kent RoeParty not recordedyes
Julie AuchParty not recordedyes
Van DiepenParty not recordedyes
Erik MuckeyParty not recordedyes
Curt MassieParty not recordedyes
Tim WalburgParty not recordedyes
Aaron AylwardParty not recordedexcused
Bethany SoyeParty not recordedexcused
Rebecca ReimerParty not recordedyes

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

South Dakota Legislature, Office of the State Treasurer
OrganizationSouth Dakota Legislature“Enacting body for House Bill 1279”Map →
OrganizationOffice of the State Treasurer“Receives remittances and credits the state employees' benefits plan”Map →

Sources

Open source document

sdlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 50)
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record