POLISCOPE
Back to feed
SB 832CALIFORNIASession 20252026

SB 832 expands Upper Los Angeles River and Tributaries Working Group membership and mandates annual revitalization reporting

Original title: Upper Los Angeles River and Tributaries Working Group: membership: revitalization plan.

August 21, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Currently Unknown. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Introduced.

Version history & redline

5 versions on file

Official version history is partial: 5 linked texts are unavailable or incomplete. Source links remain available below.

Comparing 01/05/26 - Amended Senate05/21/26 - Amended Assembly
removed addedOfficial text

The text diff for this stage has not been computed yet.

pdf extract failed: Invalid PDF structure.

Redline computed from the official version text (record lane).View this version →

The Frame

What this does

These changes alter the governance structure and oversight frequency for the Upper Los Angeles River, directly impacting how city officials and stakeholders influence watershed planning starting in the 2025-2026 legislative session.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Upper Los Angeles River and Tributaries Working Group

The group must accommodate two additional members, hold annual meetings, and manage a formal amendment process for the revitalization plan.

City of Los Angeles

The city is required to have a representative appointed from the council district with the most river miles.

What changed

Last recorded activity August 21, 2026.

What's next

Introduced.

Summary

The Upper Los Angeles River and Tributaries Working Group is required to increase its membership from 23 to 25 representatives and conduct annual meetings to report on and amend the river revitalization plan. One representative must now be appointed from the Los Angeles city council district containing the most river miles. The conservancy is also required to take action on proposed plan amendments submitted by the working group.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Why It Matters

These changes alter the governance structure and oversight frequency for the Upper Los Angeles River, directly impacting how city officials and stakeholders influence watershed planning starting in the 2025-2026 legislative session.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many members will the working group have under this bill?
The bill increases the total membership to no more than 25 representatives.
What is the new requirement for Los Angeles city council representation?
One representative must be appointed from the city council district that contains the greatest number of miles of the Upper Los Angeles River.
How often must the working group meet to discuss the revitalization plan?
The working group is required to meet at least once each year to evaluate and report on the plan's implementation.

News Coverage

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift to Continuous Oversight

The bill transitions the working group from a project-development focus to a continuous oversight model by mandating annual reporting and a formal amendment process.

Connected Entities

organizationSenate Committee on Natural Resources and WaterLegislative committee that receives the revitalization plan.Map →
organizationUpper Los Angeles River and Tributaries Working GroupThe working group responsible for developing the revitalization plan for the UppMap →
locationCity of Los AngelesThe city where the river revitalization efforts are focused.Map →
organizationSanta Monica Mountains ConservancyThe conservancy that oversees the working group and adopts the revitalization plMap →
organizationAssembly Committee on Water, Parks, and WildlifeLegislative committee that receives the revitalization plan.Map →

Sources

Open source document

openstates.org

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record