POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALcongressional record

Proposed Expansion of Joshua Tree National Park and Renaming of Visitor Center

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6044

June 24, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This amendment would transfer administrative control of approximately 20,149 acres of land from the Bureau of Land Management to the National Park Service, changing the management rules and acquisition authorities for that territory.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

National Park Service

The agency would assume administrative jurisdiction over the new 20,149 acres of land.

Bureau of Land Management

The agency would lose administrative jurisdiction over the 20,149 acres transferred to the National Park Service.

State of California

State-owned land within the new boundary is subject to specific acquisition limitations (donation or exchange only).

What changed

Last recorded activity June 24, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Background

  • Mr. Padilla is a U.S. Senator representing California. context
  • S. 4784 is the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027. context

Summary

Senator Padilla has introduced an amendment to the 2027 defense authorization bill that would expand the boundaries of Joshua Tree National Park by over 20,000 acres and rename the Cottonwood Visitor Center in honor of the late Senator Dianne Feinstein.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens to the land added to the park?
is transferred from the Bureau of Land Management to the National Park Service, meaning it will be managed under National Park regulations.
Can the government force the sale of private land for this expansion?
The amendment specifies that the Secretary of the Interior may acquire land from a 'willing seller,' and restricts acquisitions from the State of California or its subdivisions to donation or exchange only.
Will the Cottonwood Visitor Center still exist?
Yes, but it will be officially renamed the 'Dianne Feinstein Visitor Center,' and all legal references to the old name will be updated to reflect the new designation.

Why It Matters

This amendment would transfer administrative control of approximately 20,149 acres of land from the Bureau of Land Management to the National Park Service, changing the management rules and acquisition authorities for that territory.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Land Management Transfer

The amendment explicitly shifts management of 20,149 acres from the Bureau of Land Management to the National Park Service, a common mechanism for increasing federal protection levels for public lands.

Connected Entities

personMr. PadillaU.S. Senator who submitted the amendment.Map →
locationJoshua Tree National ParkThe national park subject to boundary expansion and renaming of its visitor centMap →
otherCalifornia Desert Protection Act of 1994Existing law being amended by this proposal.Map →
otherJohn D. Dingell, Jr. Conservation, Management, and Recreation ActExisting law receiving a technical correction.Map →
organizationBureau of Land ManagementCurrent administrative authority for the land proposed for transfer.Map →
organizationNational Park ServiceProposed new administrative authority for the land.Map →
personDianne FeinsteinLate U.S. Senator for whom the visitor center would be named.Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record