POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

New Jersey bill revises real property tax appeal common level range determination

Original title: Revises procedure for determining real property tax appeal outcomes.

Last action · January 13, 2026: Introduced, Referred to Assembly State and Local Government CommitteeSponsor: Auth, Robert

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

New Jersey property owners may see changes to property tax appeal outcomes under a bill requiring the Director of the Division of Taxation to certify the technical feasibility of tightening the from plus or minus 15% to plus or minus 5% of the .

Why it matters

Property owners engaged in tax assessments will experience shifted thresholds for appraisal comparisons, potentially altering the frequency of successful appeals before county boards of taxation.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Property owners

Property owners filing tax appeals face modified criteria for determining assessment discrepancies and appeal outcomes.

Directly affected

County boards of taxation

County boards of taxation resolve tax appeal actions using determinations influenced by the revised common level range.

Key Facts

  • The bill amends P.L.1973, c.123 to alter the definition and determination of the common level range for real property tax appeals.
  • The common level range is currently defined as plus or minus 15% of the average ratio of assessed to true value for a taxing district.
  • The Director of the Division of Taxation in the Department of Treasury is required to certify the technical feasibility of adjusting the common level range to plus or minus 5% on or before the first day of the sixth month following enactment.
  • If the adjustment is determined to be technically feasible, the director must apply the 5% range beginning with the next common level range determination.
Show all 5 facts
  • If the adjustment is determined not to be technically feasible, the director must revisit the technical feasibility issue on an annual basis.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the common level range do in property tax appeals?
The is used in resolving property tax appeal actions to determine whether assessments fall within an acceptable margin around the of assessed to true value.
What is the proposed change to the common level range?
The bill requires the Director of the Division of Taxation to certify the technical feasibility of narrowing the from 15% to 5% of the .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced, Referred to Assembly State and Local Government Committee

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Auth, RobertPrimary sponsorNo profile match

Connected Entities

Robert Auth, Department of Treasury, Division of Taxation
PersonRobert Auth“Assemblyman sponsoring the bill representing District 39.”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Treasury“Department housing the Division of Taxation.”Map →
OrganizationDivision of Taxation“Director of the Division of Taxation certifies technical feasibility.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

njleg.state.nj.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance50
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record