Code Enforcement Notice: 2516 Atwater Drive

Original title: (AB), Donna Birch, 2516 Atwater Drive 59-1(b)(4) NPCC - Prohibited parking (Parking inoperable vehicle, not in compliance with standards.) 59-1(c)(1) NPCC - Allowed parking (Prohibited parking must be on an approved surface.)

Record date · April 23, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

This document is a draft code enforcement case regarding parking violations at 2516 Atwater Drive. It cites specific municipal code sections concerning s and unapproved parking surfaces.

Why it matters

The property owner, Donna Birch, is subject to a code enforcement hearing regarding compliance with local parking standards at 2516 Atwater Drive.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Donna Birch

As the property owner, she is the subject of the code enforcement hearing and must address the cited parking violations.

Key Facts

The case file number is CECASE-26-00443.
The document is a draft for a 1st Hearing Case.
The case was introduced on March 10, 2026.
The property is cited for violating NPCC 59-1(b)(4) regarding the parking of an inoperable vehicle.

Show all 5 facts

The property is cited for violating NPCC 59-1(c)(1) regarding the requirement that parking must occur on an approved surface.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this document?

It is a draft notice for a code enforcement hearing regarding parking violations at a specific residential address.

What are the specific violations?

The violations involve parking an and failing to park on an , as defined by the local municipal code.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Follow the record

Votes, people, money & the original source

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sources

Open source document

webapi.legistar.com

Analysis Score

0–100

Significance15
How much this matters to a regular citizen
Controversy10
Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
Entertainment5
Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
Buzz5
Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools