POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofTrade →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

COBALT Supply Chain Act

Last action · December 17, 2024: Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.Sponsor: Christopher Smith

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill proposes to ban the import of goods containing cobalt refined in China, based on the presumption that such cobalt is linked to child and forced labor in the Democratic Republic of Congo. It requires importers to provide clear evidence that their products do not contain Chinese-refined cobalt to avoid these import restrictions.

Why it matters

If passed, this bill would restrict the import of electronics and electric vehicle components containing Chinese-refined cobalt, potentially disrupting supply chains for manufacturers and increasing compliance requirements for importers starting 180 days after enactment.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Electronics and EV Manufacturers

These companies must verify their supply chains to ensure no cobalt refined in China is used in their products to avoid import bans.

Directly affected

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

The agency is required to enforce the new import presumption, review evidence for exceptions, and publish reports on those exceptions.

Directly affected

Importers of Record

They bear the burden of proof to demonstrate that their goods do not contain Chinese-refined cobalt.

Key Facts

  • The bill establishes a rebuttable presumption that any goods containing cobalt refined in the PRC are made with forced or child labor.
  • Importers must provide clear and convincing evidence that their goods do not contain cobalt refined in the PRC to bypass the import ban.
  • The Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection must report publicly within 30 days of granting any exception to the ban.
  • The import restrictions take effect 180 days after the bill is enacted.
Show all 9 facts
  • The Forced Labor Enforcement Task Force must submit an enforcement strategy to Congress within 120 days of enactment.
  • The strategy must include methods to trace supply chains, identify third-country routes, and prevent goods denied entry from re-entering via other countries.
  • The bill cites that 15 to 30 percent of cobalt in the DRC comes from artisanal mining, involving at least 40,000 children.
  • The bill notes that 15 of the 19 cobalt mines in the DRC are owned or financed by PRC companies.
  • The bill mandates coordination with Mexico and Canada to enforce USMCA Article 23.6 regarding forced labor imports.

Frequently Asked Questions

Will this affect my smartphone or electric vehicle?
If your device contains cobalt refined in China, it could be subject to seizure or exclusion from the U.S. market under this bill.
How can a company prove their cobalt is safe?
Importers must provide 'clear and convincing evidence' to the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection that their goods do not contain cobalt refined in the PRC.
When would these rules start?
The import restrictions would take effect 180 days after the bill is signed into law.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.Dec 17, 2024

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Presumption of Guilt in Trade

The bill shifts the burden of proof entirely onto the importer to prove their supply chain is free of Chinese-refined cobalt, rather than the government proving it is tainted.

Connected Entities

Christopher Smith, Forced Labor Enforcement Task Force, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and 4 more
PersonChristopher Smith“Representative from New Jersey who introduced the bill.”Map →
OrganizationForced Labor Enforcement Task Force“Tasked with creating an enforcement strategy within 120 days of enactment.”Map →
OrganizationU.S. Customs and Border Protection“The agency responsible for enforcing the import ban and reviewing evidence.”Map →
PersonJeff Van Drew“Representative who co-sponsored the bill.”Map →
locationDemocratic Republic of Congo“The primary source of global cobalt production cited for labor abuses.”Map →
PersonZach Nunn“Representative from Iowa who co-sponsored the bill.”Map →
OrganizationPeople's Republic of China“The country whose refined cobalt is the target of the proposed import restrictio”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record