The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Utah SB 64 Alters Government Records Access, Response Deadlines, and Employee Training Requirements
Last action · March 6, 2026: Senate/ filedSponsors: Wayne Harper and 1 other
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
This bill modifies the Government Records Access and Management Act by updating public record request deadlines, adjusting fees, establishing mandatory annual records retention reviews, requiring employee records training, and creating a criminal penalty for destroying records to avoid disclosure.
Changes compliance obligations for state and local government entities, alters response timelines and cost calculations for individuals requesting public records, and introduces criminal penalties for public employees who intentionally destroy records to evade pending requests.
- The Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA) governs public access to government records in Utah. context
- SB 64 was introduced in the Utah Senate for the 2026 General Session. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Government entities and political subdivisions
Must comply with new employee training mandates, annual retention reviews, and adjusted record request response timelines.
Public employees
Must receive annual training summaries regarding government records requirements and are subject to criminal penalties for unlawful record destruction.
Record requesters
Subject to updated procedures, fee structures, and response timelines when requesting public records.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary purpose of SB 64?
Are government employees required to receive records training?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the Senate.
Procedural history
12 actions- Mar 6, 2026SenateSenate/ filed
- Mar 6, 2026SenateSenate/ strike enacting clause
- Jan 20, 2026SenateIntroducedSenate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
- Jan 13, 2026SenateSenate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
- Jan 12, 2026ReleasedLFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0064
- Jan 12, 2026Version SponsorLFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0064
Show 6 earlier actions
- Jan 7, 2026SenateSenate/ received bill from Legislative Research
- Jan 2, 2026Legislative Research and General CounselNumbered Bill Publicly Distributed
- Jan 2, 2026Legislative Research and General CounselBill Numbered but not Distributed
- Nov 19, 2025Version SponsorLFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0064
- Nov 3, 2025Legislative Fiscal AgencyLFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0064
- Nov 3, 2025Legislative Fiscal AnalystLFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0064
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Mandatory Employee Records Training
SB 64 introduces a proactive training mandate requiring all governmental entities to distribute a standardized records summary to employees annually and upon hire.
Connected Entities
Sources
le.utah.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
