POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Idaho House Bill 709 restricts programmable money and establishes consumer transaction rights

Original title: TRANSACTIONS – Amends and adds to existing law to establish provisions regarding programmable money.

Last action · February 17, 2026: Reported Printed and Referred to Business

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Idaho House Bill 709 prohibits currency issuers from enforcing automated transaction restrictions, discriminatory blocks, or s using . The measure creates civil remedies and misdemeanor penalties of up to $10,000 per violation, taking effect July 1, 2026.

Why it matters

Financial institutions and currency creators face civil lawsuits, mandatory attorney fee awards, and potential revocation of their state business license if they deny transactions based on political opinions, firearm purchases, or religious affiliations.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Consumers

Consumers gain statutory rights to request denial explanations, avoid forced digital currencies without non-digital options, and file civil lawsuits for discriminatory transaction blocks.

Directly affected

Issuers of programmable money

Issuers must alter their coding and compliance procedures to prevent automated transaction denials based on prohibited factors and must respond to denial inquiries within 30 days.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is programmable money under this bill?
is defined as currency or money that can be encoded with specific rules to automatically control or restrict its use, including denying transactions, restricting location or identity, expiring outside of normal inflation, or implementing a .
What penalties do issuers face for violating these rules?
Issuers face civil liability for actual and punitive damages, mandatory attorney fees, possible revocation of their Idaho business license for repeated violations, and misdemeanor criminal penalties up to a $10,000 fine and one year in prison per unjustified denial.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 17, 2026Committee
    Reported Printed and Referred to Business
  2. Feb 16, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, read first time, referred to JRA for Printing

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Creation of Consumer Payment Rights Chapter

The bill amends Title 28 to insert an entirely new chapter establishing specific civil and criminal penalties for discriminatory programmable money applications.

Connected Entities

BUSINESS COMMITTEE
OrganizationBUSINESS COMMITTEE“Committee sponsoring House Bill 709”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.idaho.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record