POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

West Virginia Bill HB 5541 prohibits public disclosure of personal information for elected officials

Original title: Relating to the protection of personal information for elected officials

Last action · February 16, 2026: To House JudiciarySponsors: Josh Holstein and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

House Bill 5541 extends protections to elected officials, prohibiting state agencies, businesses, and individuals from knowingly publishing or disclosing their home addresses and unpublished telephone numbers without written permission.

Why it matters

Elected officials, public defenders, and their families gain the legal right to sue individuals or businesses for at least $1,000 in statutory damages if their protected personal contact information is unlawfully disclosed.

Background
  • Daniel's Law is named after Daniel Anderl, the son of a federal judge who was murdered at his home in New Jersey by an angry litigant who obtained the family's home address online. context
  • Similar legislation protecting the personal information of judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement has been adopted in multiple states to prevent targeted harassment and violence. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Elected officials

Elected officials and their resident family members gain legal protections against the public disclosure of their home addresses and unpublished phone numbers, along with the right to sue for damages.

Directly affected

State and local government agencies

Agencies are prohibited from knowingly disclosing, redisclosing, or making available the home addresses and unpublished telephone numbers of covered public officials without written permission.

Directly affected

Businesses and associations

Entities are barred from publishing protected contact information under circumstances that could expose officials to harassment or risk of harm, and must remove such data within 24 hours upon receiving a written request.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is considered an 'elected official' under this bill?
Any person who holds an office within West Virginia by winning an election, including state and local offices, as well as anyone who has won an election but not yet taken the oath of office.
What penalties can a business or person face for failing to remove an official's personal information?
A person who willfully refuses to remove information within 24 hours of receiving a written removal request is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of up to $1,000, up to six months in jail, or both. Courts may also award injunctive relief and reasonable attorney's fees.
Does this bill prevent disclosures required by other laws?
No, the bill explicitly states that it does not prohibit disclosures required by state or federal law.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Feb 16, 2026HouseCommittee
    To House Judiciary
  2. Feb 16, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced in House
  3. Feb 16, 2026HouseCommittee
    To Judiciary
  4. Feb 16, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Filed for introduction

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Expansion of Daniel's Law Scope

The bill broadens an existing judicial and law-enforcement privacy statute to cover all elected officials at both state and local levels within West Virginia.

Connected Entities

West Virginia, United States Supreme Court, Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia and 1 more
locationWest Virginia“Jurisdiction where the bill is introduced and applies”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Supreme Court“Mentioned in the definition of a judicial officer”Map →
OrganizationSupreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia“Mentioned in the definition of a judicial officer”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Court of Appeals“Mentioned in the definition of a judicial officer”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.wvlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record