POLISCOPE
Back to feed
CALACCESS COUNTYlobbying

Lobbying Disclosure: California Incontinent Product Suppliers Association

Original title: KAHL/POWNALL ADVOCATES lobbying for CALIFORNIA INCONTINENT PRODUCT SUPPLIERS ASSOCIATION

June 20, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This document discloses the financial relationship and specific regulatory focus of a trade association attempting to influence state budget decisions affecting medical supply providers.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

California Incontinent Product Suppliers Association

The association pays for representation to influence state budget decisions affecting their industry.

Department of Health Services

The agency is the target of regulatory lobbying regarding state budget allocations.

What changed

Last recorded activity June 20, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

Kahl/Pownall Advocates reported lobbying activities and payments on behalf of the California Incontinent Product Suppliers Association for the first quarter of 2000. The firm focused on regulatory discussions with the Department of Health Services regarding the state budget.

Key Facts

  • Kahl/Pownall Advocates received $2,507.44 for lobbying services during the period of 1/1/2000 to 3/31/2000.
  • The lobbying firm represented the California Incontinent Product Suppliers Association.
  • The firm reported zero legislative lobbying activity during this period.
  • The firm engaged in regulatory lobbying with the Department of Health Services concerning the state budget.

Why It Matters

This document discloses the financial relationship and specific regulatory focus of a trade association attempting to influence state budget decisions affecting medical supply providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the lobbying firm do during this period?
They engaged in regulatory discussions with the Department of Health Services regarding the state budget.
How much was paid for these lobbying services?
The client paid $2,507.44 for the period between January 1, 2000, and March 31, 2000.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Regulatory vs Legislative Focus

The firm explicitly reported zero legislative activity, indicating a strategic focus on agency-level budget negotiations rather than lawmaking.

Connected Entities

Sources

Open source document

www.sos.ca.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record