Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act
January 8, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This legislation changes the financial obligations for local water providers in the Arkansas Valley by establishing specific repayment structures and interest rate caps, which directly impacts the long-term cost of water infrastructure for households in the region.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Arkansas Valley communities and households
These groups are the intended recipients of the domestic water supply and are subject to the repayment terms established in the conduit contract.
Contracting parties
These entities must assume the responsibility for the care, operation, maintenance, and replacement of the conduit.
Last recorded activity January 8, 2026.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Arkansas Valley Conduit?
Who is responsible for maintaining the conduit under this bill?
How long do communities have to pay back the costs?
Why It Matters
This legislation changes the financial obligations for local water providers in the Arkansas Valley by establishing specific repayment structures and interest rate caps, which directly impacts the long-term cost of water infrastructure for households in the region.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Total
422
Yes
246
No
176
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (422)
Laura Gillen
D · yes
Russ Fulcher
R · no
Mark Messmer
R · no
Hillary Scholten
D · yes
Steve Womack
R · yes
Brad Sherman
D · yes
Carlos Gimenez
R · no
Michael Rulli
R · no
William Timmons
R · no
David Kustoff
R · no
Maxwell Frost
D · yes
Timothy Kennedy
D · yes
Eric Crawford
R · no
David Rouzer
R · no
William Keating
D · yes
Deborah Ross
D · yes
Nancy Pelosi
D · yes
Kevin Mullin
D · yes
Emanuel Cleaver
D · yes
Laura Friedman
D · yes
Adam Smith
D · yes
Ken Calvert
R · no
Jason Smith
R · no
Zachary Nunn
R · no
+ 398 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Shift to Long-Term Repayment
The bill explicitly introduces a 75-year repayment window for financial hardship cases, which is a significant extension for infrastructure debt recovery.
Connected Entities
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance75How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools