The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Minnesota House Passes Bill Clarifying Athletic Trainer Scope of Practice and Supervision Rules
Last action · May 7, 2026: Referred to Health and Human ServicesSponsors: John Huot and 17 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Minnesota House File 82 redefines and updates the legal scope of practice, supervision requirements, and patient treatment protocols for licensed athletic trainers across health care settings. The measure specifies authorized clinical actions, outlines physician supervision rules, and exempts out-of-state athletic trainers accompanying visiting teams temporarily.
Licensed athletic trainers, supervising physicians, physical therapists, and patients receiving sports medicine or rehabilitative care face updated legal definitions regarding permitted medical interventions, treatment durations, and supervision hierarchies.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Licensed athletic trainers
Their professional scope of practice, supervision requirements, treatment protocols, and statutory definitions are formally updated and codified.
Primary physicians
They must establish, record on prescribed board forms, and update yearly evaluation and treatment protocols for supervised athletic trainers.
Physical therapists
They provide direct supervision to athletic trainers working in clinical, corporate, and physical therapy settings when services represent physical therapy.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What supervision is required for a licensed athletic trainer under this bill?
Are out-of-state athletic trainers traveling with sports teams allowed to practice in Minnesota?
How long can an athletic trainer treat an undiagnosed patient without a referral?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the House · in Senate committee.
Procedural history
24 actions- May 7, 2026SenateCommitteeReferred to Health and Human Services
- May 7, 2026SenateIntroducedIntroduction and first reading
- May 7, 2026SenateReceived from House
- May 7, 2026HouseAuthor added Gillman
- May 6, 2026HouseAuthor added Xiong
- May 6, 2026HouseFloorBill was passed pg. 6583 vote: 127-5
Show 18 earlier actions
- May 6, 2026HouseFloorThird reading
- May 4, 2026HouseHouse rule 1.21, placed on Calendar for the Day Wednesday, May 6, 2026
- Apr 23, 2026HouseAuthor added Sexton
- Mar 18, 2026HouseFloorSecond reading
- Mar 18, 2026HouseCommittee report, to adopt as amended
- Mar 16, 2026HouseAuthor added Allen
- Mar 12, 2026HouseAuthor added Keeler
- Mar 5, 2026HouseAuthor added Freiberg
- Mar 2, 2026HouseAuthors added Myers and Nadeau
- Feb 25, 2026HouseAuthor added Harder
- Apr 3, 2025HouseAuthor added Perryman
- Mar 27, 2025HouseAuthor added Repinski
- Mar 11, 2025HouseAuthor added Dippel
- Mar 5, 2025HouseAuthor added Hemmingsen-Jaeger
- Feb 24, 2025HouseAuthor added Virnig
- Feb 19, 2025HouseAuthor added Schultz
- Feb 13, 2025HouseAuthors added Franson and Bennett
- Feb 10, 2025HouseIntroducedIntroduction and first reading, referred to Health Finance and Policy
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 13 more sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
www.revisor.mn.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
- Controversy15Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz25Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
