POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Vermont House Bill 360 Establishes Privacy Protections and Restrictions for Mobile Identification Use

Original title: An act relating to privacy protections for mobile identification

Last action · February 26, 2025: Read first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce and Economic DevelopmentSponsors: Monique Priestley and 8 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

The Vermont General Assembly introduced House Bill 360 to establish comprehensive privacy protections for individuals using mobile identification credentials, effective July 1, 2025. The bill restricts government agencies and private entities from retaining tracking data, taking physical possession of user devices, or conditioning goods and services on mobile ID access. It also grants the Attorney General, State's Attorneys, and private individuals the right to bring enforcement actions and sue for damages.

Why it matters

Residents gain explicit legal rights to control what personal data is shared via mobile IDs and can sue for statutory damages of $2,500 for negligent violations or $5,000 for intentional violations, while businesses face strict limits on data collection and device handling.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Mobile identification holders

Mobile ID holders gain explicit consent rights over data disclosure, protection against device seizure by law enforcement, and the right to sue for statutory damages for privacy violations.

Directly affected

Law enforcement officers

Law enforcement officers are legally prohibited from taking physical possession of a mobile ID holder's device to verify identity.

Directly affected

Digital services providers and app developers

Providers are restricted from accessing, collecting, retaining, or sharing mobile ID data beyond what is strictly necessary to comply with law.

Directly affected

Private entities and businesses

Businesses are barred from conditioning goods or services on mobile ID access and face potential enforcement actions by the Attorney General and private civil lawsuits.

Key Facts

  • The Commissioner of Motor Vehicles is authorized to issue mobile identifications that provide both full and limited profiles, to be held in addition to nonmobile credentials.
  • Access to a mobile identification verification system requires the holder's explicit consent.
  • Verification systems are prohibited from sharing or retaining information regarding persons who accessed data or the locations where data was accessed.
  • Law enforcement officers and the Department or State entities are prohibited from taking physical possession of a user's device to verify identity or access mobile IDs.
Show all 10 facts
  • Digital service providers and verification system operators are barred from collecting, retaining, or sharing mobile ID data except as necessary to comply with law.
  • Businesses cannot condition the offer or use of goods or services on mobile ID or credential access, except for transactions requiring proof of age/identity by law, financial services, or medical services.
  • Businesses cannot charge different prices or provide different service quality based on whether an individual presents a mobile ID or nonmobile credential.
  • The Attorney General or a State's Attorney may bring an action against a private entity for violations under unfair trade practices statutes.
  • Aggrieved individuals may bring a civil action in Superior Court seeking damages equal to $2,500 for negligent violations or $5,000 for intentional violations, plus attorney's fees.
  • The act takes effect on July 1, 2025.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can law enforcement take my phone to check my mobile ID?
No. The bill explicitly prohibits law enforcement officers from taking physical possession of the device on which a mobile identification is accessed for verification purposes.
Can a business refuse to serve me if I use a physical ID instead of a mobile ID?
No. Businesses are prohibited from charging different prices, providing different treatment, or conditioning access based on whether an individual presents a mobile ID or an appropriate nonmobile credential.
What can I do if a private company misuses my mobile ID data?
An individual aggrieved by a violation can bring a civil action in Superior Court seeking actual damages or statutory damages of $2,500 for negligent violations and $5,000 for intentional violations, along with attorney's fees.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Feb 26, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce and Economic Development

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Establishment of Mobile ID Privacy Framework

The bill bridges traditional identification laws with electronic credentials by explicitly restricting government tracking, device confiscation, and commercial data harvesting.

Connected Entities

Department of Motor Vehicles, State’s Attorney, Attorney General and 2 more
OrganizationDepartment of Motor Vehicles“State agency authorized to issue mobile identifications and verification systems”Map →
PersonState’s Attorney“Authorized to enforce provisions against private entities”Map →
PersonAttorney General“Authorized to bring enforcement actions against private entities”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly of the State of Vermont“Enacting body for the legislation”Map →
OrganizationSuperior Courts“Authorized to impose civil penalties and hear individual civil actions”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.vermont.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record