POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Missouri House Bill 2035 criminalizes AI-generated explicit material and sets civil penalties

Original title: ARTIFICIALLY GENERATED MATERIAL

Last action · April 29, 2026: Public Hearing Held (S)Sponsors: Jeff Farnan and 3 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

House Bill 2035 prohibits using to replicate or alter an individual's image or voice to generate explicit sexual material without their express written consent. Individuals injured by such violations may sue for actual damages, attorney fees, and costs, while violators face civil penalties up to $10,000 per violation enforceable by the attorney general.

Why it matters

Victims of unauthorized AI-generated explicit media gain a statutory right to sue for financial damages, and school-affiliated personnel face criminal misdemeanor charges for providing certain explicit materials to students.

Background
  • House Bill 2035 was introduced in the Missouri House of Representatives during the Second Regular Session of the 103rd General Assembly. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

individuals whose likeness or voice may be replicated by AI

Individuals gain the right to give express written consent before their image or voice can be used for AI-generated explicit material and can sue for damages if violated.

Directly affected

school-affiliated personnel

Administrators, teachers, and other school-affiliated personnel face class A misdemeanor charges for knowingly providing explicit sexual material to students.

Directly affected

Attorney General

The attorney general is explicitly authorized to investigate suspected violations and commence actions for civil penalties.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if someone uses AI to generate explicit material of a person without permission?
The injured individual can bring a lawsuit to recover actual damages, attorney fees, and costs, and the violator faces a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per violation.
Who is authorized to investigate violations regarding unauthorized AI-generated explicit material?
The attorney general may investigate suspected violations and commence actions to collect civil penalties.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

24 actions
  1. Apr 29, 2026Senate
    Public Hearing Held (S)
  2. Apr 27, 2026Senate
    Public Hearing Scheduled (S)
  3. Apr 8, 2026SenateCommittee
    Second read and referred: General Laws(S)
  4. Mar 30, 2026Senate
    Reported to the Senate and First Read (S)
  5. Mar 26, 2026HouseFloor
    Third Read and Passed with Amendments (H)
  6. Mar 26, 2026House
    Taken Up for Third Reading (H)
Show 18 earlier actions
  1. Mar 26, 2026House
    Placed on the Informal Third Reading Calendar (H)
  2. Mar 23, 2026House
    Perfected with Amendments (H)
  3. Mar 23, 2026House
    HCS Adopted (H)
  4. Mar 23, 2026House
    Title of Bill - Agreed To
  5. Mar 23, 2026House
    Taken Up for Perfection (H)
  6. Mar 23, 2026House
    Placed on the Informal Perfection Calendar (H)
  7. Mar 10, 2026HouseCommittee
    Reported Do Pass (H)
  8. Mar 10, 2026HouseCommittee
    Voted Do Pass (H)
  9. Mar 10, 2026House
    Executive Session Completed (H)
  10. Mar 2, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Rules - Administrative(H)
  11. Feb 26, 2026HouseCommittee
    HCS Reported Do Pass (H)
  12. Feb 25, 2026HouseCommittee
    HCS Voted Do Pass (H)
  13. Feb 25, 2026House
    Executive Session Completed (H)
  14. Feb 16, 2026House
    Public Hearing Completed (H)
  15. Jan 22, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
  16. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
  17. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  18. Dec 1, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of AI Liability in State Law

The bill establishes explicit civil remedies and penalties specifically targeting the unauthorized generation of explicit material using artificial intelligence.

Connected Entities

George Hruza, General Assembly, Jeff Farnan and 2 more
PersonGeorge Hruza“Cosponsor, District 089”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“General Assembly of the state of Missouri”Map →
PersonJeff Farnan“Representative, District 001, introduced House Bill 2035”Map →
PersonMarty Joe Murray“Cosponsor, District 078”Map →
PersonJohn Hewkin“Cosponsor, District 120”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record